Unfairness Discovery and Prevention For Few-Shot Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study fairness in supervised few-shot meta-learning models that are sensitive to discrimination (or bias) in historical data. A machine learning model trained based on biased data tends to make unfair predictions for users from minority groups. Although this problem has been studied before, existing methods mainly aim to detect and control the dependency effect of the protected variables (e.g. race, gender) on target prediction based on a large amount of training data. These approaches carry two major drawbacks that (1) lacking showing a global cause-effect visualization for all variables; (2) lacking generalization of both accuracy and fairness to unseen tasks. In this work, we first discover discrimination from data using a causal Bayesian knowledge graph which not only demonstrates the dependency of the protected variable on target but also indicates causal effects between all variables. Next, we develop a novel algorithm based on risk difference in order to quantify the discriminatory influence for each protected variable in the graph. Furthermore, to protect prediction from unfairness, a fast-adapted bias-control approach in meta-learning is proposed, which efficiently mitigates statistical disparity for each task and it thus ensures independence of protected attributes on predictions based on biased and few-shot data samples. Distinct from existing meta-learning models, group unfairness of tasks are efficiently reduced by leveraging the mean difference between (un)protected groups for regression problems. Through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world data sets, we demonstrate that our proposed unfairness discovery and prevention approaches efficiently detect discrimination and mitigate biases on model output as well as generalize both accuracy and fairness to unseen tasks with a limited amount of training samples.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021Fairness-Aware Online Meta-learningcited by 19
- 2022Adaptive Fairness-Aware Online Meta-Learning for Changing Environmentscited by 17
- 2024CEB: Compositional Evaluation Benchmark for Fairness in Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2023Towards Fair Disentangled Online Learning for Changing Environmentscited by 11
- 2023Towards Counterfactual Fairness-aware Domain Generalization in Changing Environmentscited by 8
- 2023Algorithmic Fairness Generalization under Covariate and Dependence Shifts Simultaneouslycited by 7
- 2021Fair Regression under Sample Selection Biascited by 3
- 2022A Survey on Preserving Fairness Guarantees in Changing Environmentscited by 2
- 2023Fair Few-shot Learning with Auxiliary Setscited by 2
- 2024Dynamic Environment Responsive Online Meta-Learning with Fairness Awarenesscited by 2
- 2024CEB: Compositional Evaluation Benchmark for Fairness in Large Language Models2 Jul 2024
- 2024Dynamic Environment Responsive Online Meta-Learning with Fairness Awareness19 Feb 2024
- 2023Algorithmic Fairness Generalization under Covariate and Dependence Shifts Simultaneously23 Nov 2023
- 2023Towards Counterfactual Fairness-aware Domain Generalization in Changing Environments22 Sep 2023
- 2023Fair Few-shot Learning with Auxiliary Sets28 Aug 2023
- 2023Towards Fair Disentangled Online Learning for Changing Environments31 May 2023
- 2022A Survey on Preserving Fairness Guarantees in Changing Environments14 Nov 2022
- 2022Adaptive Fairness-Aware Online Meta-Learning for Changing Environments20 May 2022
- 2021Fair Regression under Sample Selection Bias8 Oct 2021
- 2021Fairness-Aware Online Meta-learning21 Aug 2021