Exploiting Submodular Value Functions For Scaling Up Active Perception
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In active perception tasks, an agent aims to select sensory actions that reduce its uncertainty about one or more hidden variables. While partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) provide a natural model for such problems, reward functions that directly penalize uncertainty in the agent's belief can remove the piecewise-linear and convex property of the value function required by most POMDP planners. Furthermore, as the number of sensors available to the agent grows, the computational cost of POMDP planning grows exponentially with it, making POMDP planning infeasible with traditional methods. In this article, we address a twofold challenge of modeling and planning for active perception tasks. We show the mathematical equivalence of ρPOMDP and POMDP-IR, two frameworks for modeling active perception tasks, that restore the PWLC property of the value function. To efficiently plan for active perception tasks, we identify and exploit the independence properties of POMDP-IR to reduce the computational cost of solving POMDP-IR (and ρPOMDP). We propose greedy point-based value iteration (PBVI), a new POMDP planning method that uses greedy maximization to greatly improve scalability in the action space of an active perception POMDP. Furthermore, we show that, under certain conditions, including submodularity, the value function computed using greedy PBVI is guaranteed to have bounded error with respect to the optimal value function. We establish the conditions under which the value function of an active perception POMDP is guaranteed to be submodular. Finally, we present a detailed empirical analysis on a dataset collected from a multi-camera tracking system employed in a shopping mall. Our method achieves similar performance to existing methods but at a fraction of the computational cost leading to better scalability for solving active perception tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes in Robotics: A Surveycited by 81
- 2022Active Acquisition for Multimodal Temporal Data: A Challenging Decision-Making Taskcited by 11
- 2021Monte Carlo Information-Oriented Planningcited by 4
- 2024United We Stand: Decentralized Multi-Agent Planning With Attritioncited by 1
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Action-Triggered Observationscited by 1
- 2022Sensor Control for Information Gain in Dynamic, Sparse and Partially Observed Environmentscited by 0
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Action-Triggered Observations2 Oct 2025
- 2024United We Stand: Decentralized Multi-Agent Planning With Attrition11 Jul 2024
- 2022Active Acquisition for Multimodal Temporal Data: A Challenging Decision-Making Task9 Nov 2022
- 2022Sensor Control for Information Gain in Dynamic, Sparse and Partially Observed Environments3 Nov 2022
- 2022Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes in Robotics: A Survey21 Sep 2022
- 2021Monte Carlo Information-Oriented Planning21 Mar 2021