Dodging DeepFake Detection via Implicit Spatial-Domain Notch Filtering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The current high-fidelity generation and high-precision detection of DeepFake images are at an arms race. We believe that producing DeepFakes that are highly realistic and 'detection evasive' can serve the ultimate goal of improving future generation DeepFake detection capabilities. In this paper, we propose a simple yet powerful pipeline to reduce the artifact patterns of fake images without hurting image quality by performing implicit spatial-domain notch filtering. We first demonstrate that frequency-domain notch filtering, although famously shown to be effective in removing periodic noise in the spatial domain, is infeasible for our task at hand due to the manual designs required for the notch filters. We, therefore, resort to a learning-based approach to reproduce the notch filtering effects, but solely in the spatial domain. We adopt a combination of adding overwhelming spatial noise for breaking the periodic noise pattern and deep image filtering to reconstruct the noise-free fake images, and we name our method DeepNotch. Deep image filtering provides a specialized filter for each pixel in the noisy image, producing filtered images with high fidelity compared to their DeepFake counterparts. Moreover, we also use the semantic information of the image to generate an adversarial guidance map to add noise intelligently. Our large-scale evaluation on 3 representative state-of-the-art DeepFake detection methods (tested on 16 types of DeepFakes) has demonstrated that our technique significantly reduces the accuracy of these 3 fake image detection methods, 36.79% on average and up to 97.02% in the best case.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizoncited by 56
- 2023SepMark: Deep Separable Watermarking for Unified Source Tracing and Deepfake Detectioncited by 43
- 2023Personalization as a Shortcut for Few-Shot Backdoor Attack against Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 42
- 2023Multi-spectral Class Center Network for Face Manipulation Detection and Localizationcited by 11
- 2022An Overview of Recent Work in Media Forensics: Methods and Threatscited by 7
- 2022Using Deep Learning to Detecting Deepfakescited by 6
- 2024Adversarial Robustness of AI-Generated Image Detectors in the Real Worldcited by 6
- 2023COMICS: End-to-end Bi-grained Contrastive Learning for Multi-face Forgery Detectioncited by 5
- 2025Zero-Shot Visual Deepfake Detection: Can AI Predict and Prevent Fake Content Before It's Created?cited by 1
- 2025LoRA Patching: Exposing the Fragility of Proactive Defenses against Deepfakescited by 0
- 2025LoRA Patching: Exposing the Fragility of Proactive Defenses against Deepfakes4 Oct 2025
- 2025Zero-Shot Visual Deepfake Detection: Can AI Predict and Prevent Fake Content Before It's Created?22 Sep 2025
- 2024Adversarial Robustness of AI-Generated Image Detectors in the Real World2 Oct 2024
- 2023COMICS: End-to-end Bi-grained Contrastive Learning for Multi-face Forgery Detection3 Aug 2023
- 2023Multi-spectral Class Center Network for Face Manipulation Detection and Localization18 May 2023
- 2023Personalization as a Shortcut for Few-Shot Backdoor Attack against Text-to-Image Diffusion Models18 May 2023
- 2023SepMark: Deep Separable Watermarking for Unified Source Tracing and Deepfake Detection10 May 2023
- 2022Using Deep Learning to Detecting Deepfakes27 Jul 2022
- 2022An Overview of Recent Work in Media Forensics: Methods and Threats26 Apr 2022
- 2021Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon27 Feb 2021