An Extension of Fano's Inequality for Characterizing Model Susceptibility to Membership Inference Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks have been shown to be vulnerable to membership inference attacks wherein the attacker aims to detect whether specific input data were used to train the model. These attacks can potentially leak private or proprietary data. We present a new extension of Fano's inequality and employ it to theoretically establish that the probability of success for a membership inference attack on a deep neural network can be bounded using the mutual information between its inputs and its activations. This enables the use of mutual information to measure the susceptibility of a DNN model to membership inference attacks. In our empirical evaluation, we show that the correlation between the mutual information and the susceptibility of the DNN model to membership inference attacks is 0.966, 0.996, and 0.955 for CIFAR-10, SVHN and GTSRB models, respectively.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 321
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Deep Regression Models for Neuroimagingcited by 22
- 2022Towards Sparsified Federated Neuroimaging Models via Weight Pruningcited by 4
- 2024Provable Privacy Attacks on Trained Shallow Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2022Secure & Private Federated Neuroimagingcited by 0
- 2024Provable Privacy Attacks on Trained Shallow Neural Networks10 Oct 2024
- 2022Towards Sparsified Federated Neuroimaging Models via Weight Pruning24 Aug 2022
- 2022Secure & Private Federated Neuroimaging11 May 2022
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Deep Regression Models for Neuroimaging6 May 2021
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey14 Mar 2021