Type-augmented Relation Prediction in Knowledge Graphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Knowledge graphs (KGs) are of great importance to many real world applications, but they generally suffer from incomplete information in the form of missing relations between entities. Knowledge graph completion (also known as relation prediction) is the task of inferring missing facts given existing ones. Most of the existing work is proposed by maximizing the likelihood of observed instance-level triples. Not much attention, however, is paid to the ontological information, such as type information of entities and relations. In this work, we propose a type-augmented relation prediction (TaRP) method, where we apply both the type information and instance-level information for relation prediction. In particular, type information and instance-level information are encoded as prior probabilities and likelihoods of relations respectively, and are combined by following Bayes' rule. Our proposed TaRP method achieves significantly better performance than state-of-the-art methods on four benchmark datasets: FB15K, FB15K-237, YAGO26K-906, and DB111K-174. In addition, we show that TaRP achieves significantly improved data efficiency. More importantly, the type information extracted from a specific dataset can generalize well to other datasets through the proposed TaRP model.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
12 papers.
- 2023Knowledge Graph Completion Models are Few-shot Learners: An Empirical Study of Relation Labeling in E-commerce with LLMscited by 24
- 2025TRIX: A More Expressive Model for Zero-shot Domain Transfer in Knowledge Graphscited by 23
- 2024Can Transformers Capture Spatial Relations between Objects?cited by 11
- 2021CORE: A Knowledge Graph Entity Type Prediction Method via Complex Space Regression and Embeddingcited by 10
- 2022Knowledge-augmented Deep Learning and Its Applications: A Surveycited by 10
- 2023Sem@K: Is my knowledge graph embedding model semantic-aware?cited by 10
- 2021Rule Induction in Knowledge Graphs Using Linear Programmingcited by 4
- 2023Treat Different Negatives Differently: Enriching Loss Functions with Domain and Range Constraints for Link Predictioncited by 3
- 2023Schema First! Learn Versatile Knowledge Graph Embeddings by Capturing Semantics with MASCHInEcited by 3
- 2024Knowledge Graph Completion using Structural and Textual Embeddingscited by 1
- 2024Relations Prediction for Knowledge Graph Completion using Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2022Learning Attention-based Representations from Multiple Patterns for Relation Prediction in Knowledge Graphscited by 0
- 2025TRIX: A More Expressive Model for Zero-shot Domain Transfer in Knowledge Graphs26 Feb 2025
- 2024Relations Prediction for Knowledge Graph Completion using Large Language Models4 May 2024
- 2024Knowledge Graph Completion using Structural and Textual Embeddings24 Apr 2024
- 2024Can Transformers Capture Spatial Relations between Objects?1 Mar 2024
- 2023Schema First! Learn Versatile Knowledge Graph Embeddings by Capturing Semantics with MASCHInE6 Jun 2023
- 2023Knowledge Graph Completion Models are Few-shot Learners: An Empirical Study of Relation Labeling in E-commerce with LLMs17 May 2023
- 2023Treat Different Negatives Differently: Enriching Loss Functions with Domain and Range Constraints for Link Prediction1 Mar 2023
- 2023Sem@K: Is my knowledge graph embedding model semantic-aware?13 Jan 2023
- 2022Knowledge-augmented Deep Learning and Its Applications: A Survey30 Nov 2022
- 2022Learning Attention-based Representations from Multiple Patterns for Relation Prediction in Knowledge Graphs7 Jun 2022
- 2021CORE: A Knowledge Graph Entity Type Prediction Method via Complex Space Regression and Embedding19 Dec 2021
- 2021Rule Induction in Knowledge Graphs Using Linear Programming15 Oct 2021