Community detection in networks using graph embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph embedding methods are becoming increasingly popular in the machine learning community, where they are widely used for tasks such as node classification and link prediction. Embedding graphs in geometric spaces should aid the identification of network communities as well, because nodes in the same community should be projected close to each other in the geometric space, where they can be detected via standard data clustering algorithms. In this paper, we test the ability of several graph embedding techniques to detect communities on benchmark graphs. We compare their performance against that of traditional community detection algorithms. We find that the performance is comparable, if the parameters of the embedding techniques are suitably chosen. However, the optimal parameter set varies with the specific features of the benchmark graphs, like their size, whereas popular community detection algorithms do not require any parameter. So it is not possible to indicate beforehand good parameter sets for the analysis of real networks. This finding, along with the high computational cost of embedding a network and grouping the points, suggests that, for community detection, current embedding techniques do not represent an improvement over network clustering algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021A Multi-purposed Unsupervised Framework for Comparing Embeddings of Undirected and Directed Graphscited by 6
- 2023Discovering Communication Pattern Shifts in Large-Scale Labeled Networks using Encoder Embedding and Vertex Dynamicscited by 5
- 2024Robustness of shallow graph embedding methods for community detectioncited by 3
- 2023Exact and rapid linear clustering of networks with dynamic programmingcited by 2
- 2023Zoo Guide to Network Embeddingcited by 2
- 2023The Map Equation Goes Neural: Mapping Network Flows with Graph Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2021Survey of Generative Methods for Social Media Analysiscited by 1
- 2024Two Layer Walk: A Community-Aware Graph Embeddingcited by 0
- 2025Urban delineation through the lens of commute networks: Leveraging graph embeddings to distinguish socioeconomic groups in citiescited by 0
- 2025Reliable data clustering with Bayesian community detectioncited by 0
- 2026Leveraging Non-linear Dimension Reduction and Random Walk Co-occurrence for Node Embeddingcited by 0
- 2026Leveraging Non-linear Dimension Reduction and Random Walk Co-occurrence for Node Embedding27 Feb 2026
- 2025Reliable data clustering with Bayesian community detection16 Oct 2025
- 2025Urban delineation through the lens of commute networks: Leveraging graph embeddings to distinguish socioeconomic groups in cities15 Jul 2025
- 2024Two Layer Walk: A Community-Aware Graph Embedding17 Dec 2024
- 2024Robustness of shallow graph embedding methods for community detection1 May 2024
- 2023The Map Equation Goes Neural: Mapping Network Flows with Graph Neural Networks2 Oct 2023
- 2023Zoo Guide to Network Embedding5 May 2023
- 2023Discovering Communication Pattern Shifts in Large-Scale Labeled Networks using Encoder Embedding and Vertex Dynamics3 May 2023
- 2023Exact and rapid linear clustering of networks with dynamic programming25 Jan 2023
- 2021Survey of Generative Methods for Social Media Analysis13 Dec 2021
- 2021A Multi-purposed Unsupervised Framework for Comparing Embeddings of Undirected and Directed Graphs30 Nov 2021