What Makes People Join Conspiracy Communities?: Role of Social Factors in Conspiracy Engagement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Widespread conspiracy theories, like those motivating anti-vaccination attitudes or climate change denial, propel collective action and bear society-wide consequences. Yet, empirical research has largely studied conspiracy theory adoption as an individual pursuit, rather than as a socially mediated process. What makes users join communities endorsing and spreading conspiracy theories? We leverage longitudinal data from 56 conspiracy communities on Reddit to compare individual and social factors determining which users join the communities. Using a quasi-experimental approach, we first identify 30K future conspiracists-(FC) and 30K matched non-conspiracists-(NC). We then provide empirical evidence of importance of social factors across six dimensions relative to the individual factors by analyzing 6 million Reddit comments and posts. Specifically in social factors, we find that dyadic interactions with members of the conspiracy communities and marginalization outside of the conspiracy communities, are the most important social precursors to conspiracy joining-even outperforming individual factor baselines. Our results offer quantitative backing to understand social processes and echo chamber effects in conspiratorial engagement, with important implications for democratic institutions and online communities.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Pathways through Conspiracy: The Evolution of Conspiracy Radicalization through Engagement in Online Conspiracy Discussionscited by 8
- 2021Characterizing Online Engagement with Disinformation and Conspiracies in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Electioncited by 3
- 2024What distinguishes conspiracy from critical narratives? A computational analysis of oppositional discoursecited by 3
- 2021Characterizing Social Imaginaries and Self-Disclosures of Dissonance in Online Conspiracy Discussion Communitiescited by 2
- 2021WMDecompose: A Framework for Leveraging the Interpretable Properties of Word Mover's Distance in Sociocultural Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Beyond the Rabbit Hole: Mapping the Relational Harms of QAnon Radicalizationcited by 0
- 2026Beyond the Rabbit Hole: Mapping the Relational Harms of QAnon Radicalization25 Jan 2026
- 2024What distinguishes conspiracy from critical narratives? A computational analysis of oppositional discourse15 Jul 2024
- 2022Pathways through Conspiracy: The Evolution of Conspiracy Radicalization through Engagement in Online Conspiracy Discussions22 Apr 2022
- 2021WMDecompose: A Framework for Leveraging the Interpretable Properties of Word Mover's Distance in Sociocultural Analysis14 Oct 2021
- 2021Characterizing Social Imaginaries and Self-Disclosures of Dissonance in Online Conspiracy Discussion Communities21 Jul 2021
- 2021Characterizing Online Engagement with Disinformation and Conspiracies in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election17 Jul 2021