Are Deep Neural Architectures Losing Information? Invertibility Is Indispensable
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ever since the advent of AlexNet, designing novel deep neural architectures for different tasks has consistently been a productive research direction. Despite the exceptional performance of various architectures in practice, we study a theoretical question: what is the condition for deep neural architectures to preserve all the information of the input data? Identifying the information lossless condition for deep neural architectures is important, because tasks such as image restoration require keep the detailed information of the input data as much as possible. Using the definition of mutual information, we show that: a deep neural architecture can preserve maximum details about the given data if and only if the architecture is invertible. We verify the advantages of our Invertible Restoring Autoencoder (IRAE) network by comparing it with competitive models on three perturbed image restoration tasks: image denoising, jpeg image decompression and image inpainting. Experimental results show that IRAE consistently outperforms non-invertible ones. Our model even contains far fewer parameters. Thus, it may be worthwhile to try replacing standard components of deep neural architectures, such as residual blocks and ReLU, with their invertible counterparts. We believe our work provides a unique perspective and direction for future deep learning research.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Invertible Denoising Network: A Light Solution for Real Noise Removalcited by 68
- 2021Disentangling Noise from Images: A Flow-Based Image Denoising Neural Networkcited by 7
- 2023Understanding and Leveraging the Learning Phases of Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2024Boundary-aware Decoupled Flow Networks for Realistic Extreme Rescalingcited by 1
- 2022The learning phases in NN: From Fitting the Majority to Fitting a Fewcited by 0
- 2023HIDFlowNet: A Flow-Based Deep Network for Hyperspectral Image Denoisingcited by 0
- 2023Synthetic CT Generation via Variant Invertible Network for All-digital Brain PET Attenuation Correctioncited by 0
- 2024General Intelligent Imaging and Uncertainty Quantification by Deterministic Diffusion Modelcited by 0
- 2025An inpainting approach to manipulate asymmetry in pre-operative breast imagescited by 0
- 2025An inpainting approach to manipulate asymmetry in pre-operative breast images8 Feb 2025
- 2024General Intelligent Imaging and Uncertainty Quantification by Deterministic Diffusion Model23 Aug 2024
- 2024Boundary-aware Decoupled Flow Networks for Realistic Extreme Rescaling5 May 2024
- 2023Understanding and Leveraging the Learning Phases of Neural Networks11 Dec 2023
- 2023Synthetic CT Generation via Variant Invertible Network for All-digital Brain PET Attenuation Correction3 Oct 2023
- 2023HIDFlowNet: A Flow-Based Deep Network for Hyperspectral Image Denoising20 Jun 2023
- 2022The learning phases in NN: From Fitting the Majority to Fitting a Few16 Feb 2022
- 2021Disentangling Noise from Images: A Flow-Based Image Denoising Neural Network11 May 2021
- 2021Invertible Denoising Network: A Light Solution for Real Noise Removal21 Apr 2021