Multiple Classification with Split Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Privacy issues were raised in the process of training deep learning in medical, mobility, and other fields. To solve this problem, we present privacy-preserving distributed deep learning method that allow clients to learn a variety of data without direct exposure. We divided a single deep learning architecture into a common extractor, a cloud model and a local classifier for the distributed learning. First, the common extractor, which is used by local clients, extracts secure features from the input data. The secure features also take the role that the cloud model can employ various task and diverse types of data. The feature contain the most important information that helps to proceed various task. Second, the cloud model including most parts of the whole training model gets the embedded features from the massive local clients, and performs most of deep learning operations which takes severe computing cost. After the operations in cloud model finished, outputs of the cloud model send back to local clients. Finally, the local classifier determined classification results and delivers the results to local clients. When clients train models, our model does not directly expose sensitive information to exterior network. During the test, the average performance improvement was 2.63% over the existing local training model. However, in a distributed environment, there is a possibility of inversion attack due to exposed features. For this reason, we experimented with the common extractor to prevent data restoration. The quality of restoration of the original image was tested by adjusting the depth of the common extractor. As a result, we found that the deeper the common extractor, the restoration score decreased to 89.74.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Similarity-based Label Inference Attack against Training and Inference of Split Learningcited by 15
- 2023Exploring the Privacy-Energy Consumption Tradeoff for Split Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2023Towards Open Federated Learning Platforms: Survey and Vision from Technical and Legal Perspectivescited by 3
- 2024URVFL: Undetectable Data Reconstruction Attack on Vertical Federated Learningcited by 3
- 2025Federated Split Learning with Improved Communication and Storage Efficiencycited by 3
- 2024How Can Incentives and Cut Layer Selection Influence Data Contribution in Split Federated Learning?cited by 0
- 2025Federated Split Learning with Improved Communication and Storage Efficiency21 Jul 2025
- 2024How Can Incentives and Cut Layer Selection Influence Data Contribution in Split Federated Learning?10 Dec 2024
- 2024URVFL: Undetectable Data Reconstruction Attack on Vertical Federated Learning30 Apr 2024
- 2023Exploring the Privacy-Energy Consumption Tradeoff for Split Federated Learning15 Nov 2023
- 2023Towards Open Federated Learning Platforms: Survey and Vision from Technical and Legal Perspectives5 Jul 2023
- 2022Similarity-based Label Inference Attack against Training and Inference of Split Learning10 Mar 2022