Accuracy and Performance Comparison of Video Action Recognition Approaches
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Over the past few years, there has been significant interest in video action recognition systems and models. However, direct comparison of accuracy and computational performance results remain clouded by differing training environments, hardware specifications, hyperparameters, pipelines, and inference methods. This article provides a direct comparison between fourteen off-the-shelf and state-of-the-art models by ensuring consistency in these training characteristics in order to provide readers with a meaningful comparison across different types of video action recognition algorithms. Accuracy of the models is evaluated using standard Top-1 and Top-5 accuracy metrics in addition to a proposed new accuracy metric. Additionally, we compare computational performance of distributed training from two to sixty-four GPUs on a state-of-the-art HPC system.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2.
2 papers.