Low depth mechanisms for quantum optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One of the major application areas of interest for both near-term and fault-tolerant quantum computers is the optimization of classical objective functions. In this work, we develop intuitive constructions for a large class of these algorithms based on connections to simple dynamics of quantum systems, quantum walks, and classical continuous relaxations. We focus on developing a language and tools connected with kinetic energy on a graph for understanding the physical mechanisms of success and failure to guide algorithmic improvement. This physical language, in combination with uniqueness results related to unitarity, allow us to identify some potential pitfalls from kinetic energy fundamentally opposing the goal of optimization. This is connected to effects from wavefunction confinement, phase randomization, and shadow defects lurking in the objective far away from the ideal solution. As an example, we explore the surprising deficiency of many quantum methods in solving uncoupled spin problems and how this is both predictive of performance on some more complex systems while immediately suggesting simple resolutions. Further examination of canonical problems like the Hamming ramp or bush of implications show that entanglement can be strictly detrimental to performance results from the underlying mechanism of solution in approaches like QAOA. Kinetic energy and graph Laplacian perspectives provide new insights to common initialization and optimal solutions in QAOA as well as new methods for more effective layerwise training. Connections to classical methods of continuous extensions, homotopy methods, and iterated rounding suggest new directions for research in quantum optimization. Throughout, we unveil many pitfalls and mechanisms in quantum optimization using a physical perspective, which aim to spur the development of novel quantum optimization algorithms and refinements.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022Reinforcement Learning Assisted Recursive QAOAcited by 8
- 2021Quantum Optimization for Training Quantum Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2021Variational Quantum Classifiers Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 4
- 2021An Introduction to Quantum Computing for Statisticians and Data Scientistscited by 1
- 2023Neural Networks for Programming Quantum Annealerscited by 0
- 2023Neural Networks for Programming Quantum Annealers13 Aug 2023
- 2022Reinforcement Learning Assisted Recursive QAOA13 Jul 2022
- 2021An Introduction to Quantum Computing for Statisticians and Data Scientists13 Dec 2021
- 2021Variational Quantum Classifiers Through the Lens of the Hessian21 May 2021
- 2021Quantum Optimization for Training Quantum Neural Networks31 Mar 2021