Dataset Bias in Few-shot Image Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The goal of few-shot image recognition (FSIR) is to identify novel categories with a small number of annotated samples by exploiting transferable knowledge from training data (base categories). Most current studies assume that the transferable knowledge can be well used to identify novel categories. However, such transferable capability may be impacted by the dataset bias, and this problem has rarely been investigated before. Besides, most of few-shot learning methods are biased to different datasets, which is also an important issue that needs to be investigated deeply. In this paper, we first investigate the impact of transferable capabilities learned from base categories. Specifically, we use the relevance to measure relationships between base categories and novel categories. Distributions of base categories are depicted via the instance density and category diversity. The FSIR model learns better transferable knowledge from relevant training data. In the relevant data, dense instances or diverse categories can further enrich the learned knowledge. Experimental results on different sub-datasets of ImagNet demonstrate category relevance, instance density and category diversity can depict transferable bias from base categories. Second, we investigate performance differences on different datasets from dataset structures and different few-shot learning methods. Specifically, we introduce image complexity, intra-concept visual consistency, and inter-concept visual similarity to quantify characteristics of dataset structures. We use these quantitative characteristics and four few-shot learning methods to analyze performance differences on five different datasets. Based on the experimental analysis, some insightful observations are obtained from the perspective of both dataset structures and few-shot learning methods. We hope these observations are useful to guide future FSIR research.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2025The Evolution of Dataset Distillation: Toward Scalable and Generalizable Solutionscited by 24
- 2023Weakly Supervised Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 11
- 2024DIAGen: Semantically Diverse Image Augmentation with Generative Models for Few-Shot Learningcited by 3
- 2024Task Attribute Distance for Few-Shot Learning: Theoretical Analysis and Applicationscited by 1
- 2025Mitigating Knowledge Discrepancies among Multiple Datasets for Task-agnostic Unified Face Alignmentcited by 1
- 2023EqGAN: Feature Equalization Fusion for Few-shot Image Generationcited by 0
- 2025Geometric Origins of Bias in Deep Neural Networks: A Human Visual System Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026Impact of canny edge detection preprocessing on performance of machine learning models for Parkinson's disease classificationcited by 0
- 2026Impact of canny edge detection preprocessing on performance of machine learning models for Parkinson's disease classification7 Sep 2026
- 2025Mitigating Knowledge Discrepancies among Multiple Datasets for Task-agnostic Unified Face Alignment28 Mar 2025
- 2025Geometric Origins of Bias in Deep Neural Networks: A Human Visual System Perspective17 Feb 2025
- 2025The Evolution of Dataset Distillation: Toward Scalable and Generalizable Solutions8 Feb 2025
- 2024DIAGen: Semantically Diverse Image Augmentation with Generative Models for Few-Shot Learning26 Aug 2024
- 2024Task Attribute Distance for Few-Shot Learning: Theoretical Analysis and Applications6 Mar 2024
- 2023Weakly Supervised Open-Vocabulary Object Detection19 Dec 2023
- 2023EqGAN: Feature Equalization Fusion for Few-shot Image Generation27 Jul 2023