Fast Dimension Independent Private AdaGrad on Publicly Estimated Subspaces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We revisit the problem of empirical risk minimziation (ERM) with differential privacy. We show that noisy AdaGrad, given appropriate knowledge and conditions on the subspace from which gradients can be drawn, achieves a regret comparable to traditional AdaGrad plus a well-controlled term due to noise. We show a convergence rate of O(Tr(GT)/T), where GT captures the geometry of the gradient subspace. Since Tr(GT)=O(√T) we can obtain faster rates for convex and Lipschitz functions, compared to the O(1/√T) rate achieved by known versions of noisy (stochastic) gradient descent with comparable noise variance. In particular, we show that if the gradients lie in a known constant rank subspace, and assuming algorithmic access to an envelope which bounds decaying sensitivity, one can achieve faster convergence to an excess empirical risk of tilde O(1/ε n), where ε is the privacy budget and n the number of samples. Letting p be the problem dimension, this result implies that, by running noisy Adagrad, we can bypass the DP-SGD bound tilde O(√p/ε n) in T=(ε n)2/(1+2α) iterations, where α ≥ 0 is a parameter controlling gradient norm decay, instead of the rate achieved by SGD of T=ε2n2. Our results operate with general convex functions in both constrained and unconstrained minimization. Along the way, we do a perturbation analysis of noisy AdaGrad of independent interest. Our utility guarantee for the private ERM problem follows as a corollary to the regret guarantee of noisy AdaGrad.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021A Field Guide to Federated Optimizationcited by 312
- 2021Large Scale Private Learning via Low-rank Reparametrizationcited by 87
- 2021Do Not Let Privacy Overbill Utility: Gradient Embedding Perturbation for Private Learningcited by 86
- 2021Public Data-Assisted Mirror Descent for Private Model Trainingcited by 49
- 2021Private Adaptive Gradient Methods for Convex Optimizationcited by 46
- 2024PrE-Text: Training Language Models on Private Federated Data in the Age of LLMscited by 29
- 2023Choosing Public Datasets for Private Machine Learning via Gradient Subspace Distancecited by 14
- 2022Stability Based Generalization Bounds for Exponential Family Langevin Dynamicscited by 8
- 2021The Power of Sampling: Dimension-free Risk Bounds in Private ERMcited by 3
- 2024On Differentially Private Subspace Estimation in a Distribution-Free Settingcited by 1
- 2024PrE-Text: Training Language Models on Private Federated Data in the Age of LLMs5 Jun 2024
- 2024On Differentially Private Subspace Estimation in a Distribution-Free Setting9 Feb 2024
- 2023Choosing Public Datasets for Private Machine Learning via Gradient Subspace Distance2 Mar 2023
- 2022Stability Based Generalization Bounds for Exponential Family Langevin Dynamics9 Jan 2022
- 2021Public Data-Assisted Mirror Descent for Private Model Training1 Dec 2021
- 2021A Field Guide to Federated Optimization14 Jul 2021
- 2021Private Adaptive Gradient Methods for Convex Optimization25 Jun 2021
- 2021Large Scale Private Learning via Low-rank Reparametrization17 Jun 2021
- 2021The Power of Sampling: Dimension-free Risk Bounds in Private ERM28 May 2021
- 2021Do Not Let Privacy Overbill Utility: Gradient Embedding Perturbation for Private Learning25 Feb 2021