On the Importance of Local Information in Transformer Based Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The self-attention module is a key component of Transformer-based models, wherein each token pays attention to every other token. Recent studies have shown that these heads exhibit syntactic, semantic, or local behaviour. Some studies have also identified promise in restricting this attention to be local, i.e., a token attending to other tokens only in a small neighbourhood around it. However, no conclusive evidence exists that such local attention alone is sufficient to achieve high accuracy on multiple NLP tasks. In this work, we systematically analyse the role of locality information in learnt models and contrast it with the role of syntactic information. More specifically, we first do a sensitivity analysis and show that, at every layer, the representation of a token is much more sensitive to tokens in a small neighborhood around it than to tokens which are syntactically related to it. We then define an attention bias metric to determine whether a head pays more attention to local tokens or to syntactically related tokens. We show that a larger fraction of heads have a locality bias as compared to a syntactic bias. Having established the importance of local attention heads, we train and evaluate models where varying fractions of the attention heads are constrained to be local. Such models would be more efficient as they would have fewer computations in the attention layer. We evaluate these models on 4 GLUE datasets (QQP, SST-2, MRPC, QNLI) and 2 MT datasets (En-De, En-Ru) and clearly demonstrate that such constrained models have comparable performance to the unconstrained models. Through this systematic evaluation we establish that attention in Transformer-based models can be constrained to be local without affecting performance.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025CacheClip: Accelerating RAG with Effective KV Cache Reusecited by 16
- 2025MoKA: Mixture of Kronecker Adapterscited by 2
- 2021Leveraging Local Temporal Information for Multimodal Scene Classificationcited by 0
- 2025CacheClip: Accelerating RAG with Effective KV Cache Reuse11 Oct 2025
- 2025MoKA: Mixture of Kronecker Adapters5 Aug 2025
- 2021Leveraging Local Temporal Information for Multimodal Scene Classification26 Oct 2021