Equilibria for Games with Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Objectives
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The overall aim of our research is to develop techniques to reason about the equilibrium properties of multi-agent systems. We model multi-agent systems as concurrent games, in which each player is a process that is assumed to act independently and strategically in pursuit of personal preferences. In this article, we study these games in the context of finite-memory strategies, and we assume players' preferences are defined by a qualitative and a quantitative objective, which are related by a lexicographic order: a player first prefers to satisfy its qualitative objective (given as a formula of Linear Temporal Logic) and then prefers to minimise costs (given by a mean-payoff function). Our main result is that deciding the existence of a strict epsilon Nash equilibrium in such games is 2ExpTime-complete (and hence decidable), even if players' deviations are implemented as infinite-memory strategies.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.
- 2023Discounting in Strategy Logiccited by 0
- 2023Discounting in Strategy Logic24 May 2023