Spatio-temporal Attention Model for Tactile Texture Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, tactile sensing has attracted great interest in robotics, especially for facilitating exploration of unstructured environments and effective manipulation. A detailed understanding of the surface textures via tactile sensing is essential for many of these tasks. Previous works on texture recognition using camera based tactile sensors have been limited to treating all regions in one tactile image or all samples in one tactile sequence equally, which includes much irrelevant or redundant information. In this paper, we propose a novel Spatio-Temporal Attention Model (STAM) for tactile texture recognition, which is the very first of its kind to our best knowledge. The proposed STAM pays attention to both spatial focus of each single tactile texture and the temporal correlation of a tactile sequence. In the experiments to discriminate 100 different fabric textures, the spatially and temporally selective attention has resulted in a significant improvement of the recognition accuracy, by up to 18.8%, compared to the non-attention based models. Specifically, after introducing noisy data that is collected before the contact happens, our proposed STAM can learn the salient features efficiently and the accuracy can increase by 15.23% on average compared with the CNN based baseline approach. The improved tactile texture perception can be applied to facilitate robot tasks like grasping and manipulation.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2024Binding Touch to Everything: Learning Unified Multimodal Tactile Representationscited by 94
- 2025ConViTac: Aligning Visual-Tactile Fusion with Contrastive Representationscited by 7
- 2024What Matters for Active Texture Recognition With Vision-Based Tactile Sensorscited by 6
- 2021Vision-Guided Active Tactile Perception for Crack Detection and Reconstructioncited by 3
- 2024Jointly Modeling Spatio-Temporal Features of Tactile Signals for Action Classificationcited by 3
- 2021Multimodal perception for dexterous manipulationcited by 2
- 2023Attention for Robot Touch: Tactile Saliency Prediction for Robust Sim-to-Real Tactile Controlcited by 2
- 2025Towards Generalization of Tactile Image Generation: Reference-Free Evaluation in a Leakage-Free Settingcited by 1
- 2023Open-Set Object Recognition Using Mechanical Properties During Interactioncited by 0
- 2026SemanticFeels: Semantic Labeling during In-Hand Manipulationcited by 0
- 2026SemanticFeels: Semantic Labeling during In-Hand Manipulation15 Feb 2026
- 2025ConViTac: Aligning Visual-Tactile Fusion with Contrastive Representations25 Jun 2025
- 2025Towards Generalization of Tactile Image Generation: Reference-Free Evaluation in a Leakage-Free Setting10 Mar 2025
- 2024What Matters for Active Texture Recognition With Vision-Based Tactile Sensors20 Mar 2024
- 2024Binding Touch to Everything: Learning Unified Multimodal Tactile Representations31 Jan 2024
- 2024Jointly Modeling Spatio-Temporal Features of Tactile Signals for Action Classification21 Jan 2024
- 2023Open-Set Object Recognition Using Mechanical Properties During Interaction2 Nov 2023
- 2023Attention for Robot Touch: Tactile Saliency Prediction for Robust Sim-to-Real Tactile Control26 Jul 2023
- 2021Multimodal perception for dexterous manipulation28 Dec 2021
- 2021Vision-Guided Active Tactile Perception for Crack Detection and Reconstruction13 May 2021