Statistical Query Lower Bounds for Tensor PCA
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the Tensor PCA problem introduced by Richard and Montanari (2014), one is given a dataset consisting of n samples T1:n of i.i.d. Gaussian tensors of order k with the promise that mathbbET1 is a rank-1 tensor and |mathbbE T1| = 1. The goal is to estimate mathbbE T1. This problem exhibits a large conjectured hard phase when k>2: When d lesssim n ll d^frack2 it is information theoretically possible to estimate mathbbE T1, but no polynomial time estimator is known. We provide a sharp analysis of the optimal sample complexity in the Statistical Query (SQ) model and show that SQ algorithms with polynomial query complexity not only fail to solve Tensor PCA in the conjectured hard phase, but also have a strictly sub-optimal sample complexity compared to some polynomial time estimators such as the Richard-Montanari spectral estimator. Our analysis reveals that the optimal sample complexity in the SQ model depends on whether mathbbE T1 is symmetric or not. For symmetric, even order tensors, we also isolate a sample size regime in which it is possible to test if mathbbE T1 = 0 or mathbbET1 neq 0 with polynomially many queries but not estimate mathbbET1. Our proofs rely on the Fourier analytic approach of Feldman, Perkins and Vempala (2018) to prove sharp SQ lower bounds.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2023Smoothing the Landscape Boosts the Signal for SGD: Optimal Sample Complexity for Learning Single Index Modelscited by 60
- 2024Neural network learns low-dimensional polynomials with SGD near the information-theoretic limitcited by 45
- 2022Tensor-on-Tensor Regression: Riemannian Optimization, Over-parameterization, Statistical-computational Gap, and Their Interplaycited by 15
- 2021Clustering a Mixture of Gaussians with Unknown Covariancecited by 14
- 2025The Generative Leap: Sharp Sample Complexity for Efficiently Learning Gaussian Multi-Index Modelscited by 6
- 2024Sample and Computationally Efficient Robust Learning of Gaussian Single-Index Modelscited by 4
- 2023SQ Lower Bounds for Random Sparse Planted Vector Problemcited by 3
- 2024Cryptographic Hardness of Score Estimationcited by 3
- 2022Distributional Hardness Against Preconditioned Lasso via Erasure-Robust Designscited by 2
- 2024Sharp Analysis of Power Iteration for Tensor PCAcited by 2
- 2021Selective Multiple Power Iteration: from Tensor PCA to gradient-based exploration of landscapescited by 0
- 2025The Generative Leap: Sharp Sample Complexity for Efficiently Learning Gaussian Multi-Index Models5 Jun 2025
- 2024Sample and Computationally Efficient Robust Learning of Gaussian Single-Index Models8 Nov 2024
- 2024Neural network learns low-dimensional polynomials with SGD near the information-theoretic limit3 Jun 2024
- 2024Cryptographic Hardness of Score Estimation4 Apr 2024
- 2024Sharp Analysis of Power Iteration for Tensor PCA2 Jan 2024
- 2023Smoothing the Landscape Boosts the Signal for SGD: Optimal Sample Complexity for Learning Single Index Models18 May 2023
- 2023SQ Lower Bounds for Random Sparse Planted Vector Problem26 Jan 2023
- 2022Tensor-on-Tensor Regression: Riemannian Optimization, Over-parameterization, Statistical-computational Gap, and Their Interplay17 Jun 2022
- 2022Distributional Hardness Against Preconditioned Lasso via Erasure-Robust Designs5 Mar 2022
- 2021Selective Multiple Power Iteration: from Tensor PCA to gradient-based exploration of landscapes23 Dec 2021
- 2021Clustering a Mixture of Gaussians with Unknown Covariance4 Oct 2021