Chance Constrained Policy Optimization for Process Control and Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Chemical process optimization and control are affected by 1) plant-model mismatch, 2) process disturbances, and 3) constraints for safe operation. Reinforcement learning by policy optimization would be a natural way to solve this due to its ability to address stochasticity, plant-model mismatch, and directly account for the effect of future uncertainty and its feedback in a proper closed-loop manner; all without the need of an inner optimization loop. One of the main reasons why reinforcement learning has not been considered for industrial processes (or almost any engineering application) is that it lacks a framework to deal with safety critical constraints. Present algorithms for policy optimization use difficult-to-tune penalty parameters, fail to reliably satisfy state constraints or present guarantees only in expectation. We propose a chance constrained policy optimization (CCPO) algorithm which guarantees the satisfaction of joint chance constraints with a high probability - which is crucial for safety critical tasks. This is achieved by the introduction of constraint tightening (backoffs), which are computed simultaneously with the feedback policy. Backoffs are adjusted with Bayesian optimization using the empirical cumulative distribution function of the probabilistic constraints, and are therefore self-tuned. This results in a general methodology that can be imbued into present policy optimization algorithms to enable them to satisfy joint chance constraints with high probability. We present case studies that analyze the performance of the proposed approach.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021Safe Chance Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Batch Process Controlcited by 10
- 2021Safe Real-Time Optimization using Multi-Fidelity Gaussian Processescited by 5
- 2022When Bioprocess Engineering Meets Machine Learning: A Survey from the Perspective of Automated Bioprocess Developmentcited by 4
- 2022Neural ODEs as Feedback Policies for Nonlinear Optimal Controlcited by 4
- 2022Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Scheduling of Chemical Production Processescited by 2
- 2023Distributional constrained reinforcement learning for supply chain optimizationcited by 2
- 2025Survey and Tutorial of Reinforcement Learning Methods in Process Systems Engineeringcited by 2
- 2024Constraint-Generation Policy Optimization (CGPO): Nonlinear Programming for Policy Optimization in Mixed Discrete-Continuous MDPscited by 0
- 2026Bayesian Optimization of Partially Known Systems using Hybrid Modelscited by 0
- 2026Addressing Terminal Constraints in Data-Driven Demand Response Schedulingcited by 0
- 2026Addressing Terminal Constraints in Data-Driven Demand Response Scheduling14 May 2026
- 2026Bayesian Optimization of Partially Known Systems using Hybrid Models11 Mar 2026
- 2025Survey and Tutorial of Reinforcement Learning Methods in Process Systems Engineering28 Oct 2025
- 2024Constraint-Generation Policy Optimization (CGPO): Nonlinear Programming for Policy Optimization in Mixed Discrete-Continuous MDPs20 Jan 2024
- 2023Distributional constrained reinforcement learning for supply chain optimization3 Feb 2023
- 2022Neural ODEs as Feedback Policies for Nonlinear Optimal Control20 Oct 2022
- 2022When Bioprocess Engineering Meets Machine Learning: A Survey from the Perspective of Automated Bioprocess Development2 Sep 2022
- 2022Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Scheduling of Chemical Production Processes1 Mar 2022
- 2021Safe Real-Time Optimization using Multi-Fidelity Gaussian Processes10 Nov 2021
- 2021Safe Chance Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Batch Process Control23 Apr 2021