A Comparative Re-Assessment of Feature Extractors for Deep Speaker Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern automatic speaker verification relies largely on deep neural networks (DNNs) trained on mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) features. While there are alternative feature extraction methods based on phase, prosody and long-term temporal operations, they have not been extensively studied with DNN-based methods. We aim to fill this gap by providing extensive re-assessment of 14 feature extractors on VoxCeleb and SITW datasets. Our findings reveal that features equipped with techniques such as spectral centroids, group delay function, and integrated noise suppression provide promising alternatives to MFCCs for deep speaker embeddings extraction. Experimental results demonstrate up to 16.3% (VoxCeleb) and 25.1% (SITW) relative decrease in equal error rate (EER) to the baseline.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022Tiny, always-on and fragile: Bias propagation through design choices in on-device machine learning workflowscited by 8
- 2021Learnable MFCCs for Speaker Verificationcited by 6
- 2021Optimized Power Normalized Cepstral Coefficients towards Robust Deep Speaker Verificationcited by 2
- 2021Parameterized Channel Normalization for Far-field Deep Speaker Verificationcited by 1
- 2021Optimizing Multi-Taper Features for Deep Speaker Verificationcited by 0
- 2022Tiny, always-on and fragile: Bias propagation through design choices in on-device machine learning workflows19 Jan 2022
- 2021Optimizing Multi-Taper Features for Deep Speaker Verification21 Oct 2021
- 2021Optimized Power Normalized Cepstral Coefficients towards Robust Deep Speaker Verification24 Sep 2021
- 2021Parameterized Channel Normalization for Far-field Deep Speaker Verification24 Sep 2021
- 2021Learnable MFCCs for Speaker Verification20 Feb 2021