mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Correctness by construction for probabilistic programs

arXiv 2007.15246 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2020cs.LOcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The "correct by construction" paradigm is an important component of modern Formal Methods, and here we use the probabilistic Guarded-Command Language mathitpGCL to illustrate its application to mathitprobabilistic programming. mathitpGCL extends Dijkstra's guarded-command language mathitGCL with probabilistic choice, and is equipped with a correctness-preserving refinement relation (sqsubseteq) that enables compact, abstract specifications of probabilistic properties to be transformed gradually to concrete, executable code by applying mathematical insights in a systematic and layered way. Characteristically for "correctness by construction", as far as possible the reasoning in each refinement-step layer does not depend on earlier layers, and does not affect later ones. We demonstrate the technique by deriving a fair-coin implementation of any given discrete probability distribution. In the special case of simulating a fair die, our correct-by-construction algorithm turns out to be "within spitting distance" of Knuth and Yao's optimal solution.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

2 papers.