Simultaneously Learning Corrections and Error Models for Geometry-based Visual Odometry Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper fosters the idea that deep learning methods can be used to complement classical visual odometry pipelines to improve their accuracy and to associate uncertainty models to their estimations. We show that the biases inherent to the visual odometry process can be faithfully learned and compensated for, and that a learning architecture associated with a probabilistic loss function can jointly estimate a full covariance matrix of the residual errors, defining an error model capturing the heteroscedasticity of the process. Experiments on autonomous driving image sequences assess the possibility to concurrently improve visual odometry and estimate an error associated with its outputs.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Loss it right: Euclidean and Riemannian Metrics in Learning-based Visual Odometrycited by 6
- 2022Deep Bayesian ICP Covariance Estimationcited by 2
- 2024Salient Sparse Visual Odometry With Pose-Only Supervisioncited by 2
- 2021A Consistency-Based Loss for Deep Odometry Through Uncertainty Propagationcited by 0
- 2024Salient Sparse Visual Odometry With Pose-Only Supervision6 Apr 2024
- 2023Loss it right: Euclidean and Riemannian Metrics in Learning-based Visual Odometry19 Dec 2023
- 2022Deep Bayesian ICP Covariance Estimation23 Feb 2022
- 2021A Consistency-Based Loss for Deep Odometry Through Uncertainty Propagation1 Jul 2021