mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Autosegmental Neural Nets: Should Phones and Tones be Synchronous or Asynchronous?

arXiv 2007.14351 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2020eess.AS cs.SDcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Phones, the segmental units of the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), are used for lexical distinctions in most human languages; Tones, the suprasegmental units of the IPA, are used in perhaps 70%. Many previous studies have explored cross-lingual adaptation of automatic speech recognition (ASR) phone models, but few have explored the multilingual and cross-lingual transfer of synchronization between phones and tones. In this paper, we test four Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC)-based acoustic models, differing in the degree of synchrony they impose between phones and tones. Models are trained and tested multilingually in three languages, then adapted and tested cross-lingually in a fourth. Both synchronous and asynchronous models are effective in both multilingual and cross-lingual settings. Synchronous models achieve lower error rate in the joint phone+tone tier, but asynchronous training results in lower tone error rate.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.