mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A comparative analysis of knowledge acquisition performance in complex networks

arXiv 2007.12028 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2020cs.SI physics.soc-phcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Discovery processes have been an important topic in the network science field. The exploration of nodes can be understood as the knowledge acquisition process taking place in the network, where nodes represent concepts and edges are the semantical relationships between concepts. While some studies have analyzed the performance of the knowledge acquisition process in particular network topologies, here we performed a systematic performance analysis in well-known dynamics and topologies. Several interesting results have been found. Overall, all learning curves displayed the same learning shape, with different speed rates. We also found ambiguities in the feature space describing the learning curves, meaning that the same knowledge acquisition curve can be generated in different combinations of network topology and dynamics. A surprising example of such patterns are the learning curves obtained from random and Waxman networks: despite the very distinct characteristics in terms of global structure, several curves from different models turned out to be similar. All in all, our results suggest that different learning strategies can lead to the same learning performance. From the network reconstruction point of view, however, this means that learning curves of observed sequences should be combined with other sequence features if one aims at inferring network topology from observed sequences.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

3 papers.