mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Geometric compression of invariant manifolds in neural nets

arXiv 2007.11471 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 28

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study how neural networks compress uninformative input space in models where data lie in d dimensions, but whose label only vary within a linear manifold of dimension d_parallel < d. We show that for a one-hidden layer network initialized with infinitesimal weights (i.e. in the feature learning regime) trained with gradient descent, the first layer of weights evolve to become nearly insensitive to the d_perp=d-d_parallel uninformative directions. These are effectively compressed by a factor λ~ √p, where p is the size of the training set. We quantify the benefit of such a compression on the test error ε. For large initialization of the weights (the lazy training regime), no compression occurs and for regular boundaries separating labels we find that ε ~ p-β, with βLazy = d / (3d-2). Compression improves the learning curves so that βFeature = (2d-1)/(3d-2) if d_parallel = 1 and βFeature = (d + d_perp/2)/(3d-2) if d_parallel > 1. We test these predictions for a stripe model where boundaries are parallel interfaces (d_parallel=1) as well as for a cylindrical boundary (d_parallel=2). Next we show that compression shapes the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) evolution in time, so that its top eigenvectors become more informative and display a larger projection on the labels. Consequently, kernel learning with the frozen NTK at the end of training outperforms the initial NTK. We confirm these predictions both for a one-hidden layer FC network trained on the stripe model and for a 16-layers CNN trained on MNIST, for which we also find βFeature>βLazy.

Key facts. Cited by 28 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 8; 2023: 7; 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

28 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 218
  2. 2023Grokking as the Transition from Lazy to Rich Training Dynamicscited by 102
  3. 2021A Structured Dictionary Perspective on Implicit Neural Representationscited by 100
  4. 2023How Deep Neural Networks Learn Compositional Data: The Random Hierarchy Modelcited by 70
  5. 2021Classifying high-dimensional Gaussian mixtures: Where kernel methods fail and neural networks succeedcited by 67
  6. 2024How Feature Learning Can Improve Neural Scaling Lawscited by 55
  7. 2021What can linearized neural networks actually say about generalization?cited by 49
  8. 2022Limitations of the NTK for Understanding Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 34
  9. 2021A Theory of Neural Tangent Kernel Alignment and Its Influence on Trainingcited by 25
  10. 2022The Onset of Variance-Limited Behavior for Networks in the Lazy and Rich Regimescited by 25
  11. 2022Learning sparse features can lead to overfitting in neural networkscited by 23
  12. 2023How connectivity structure shapes rich and lazy learning in neural circuitscited by 15
16 more
  1. 2022Evolution of Neural Tangent Kernels under Benign and Adversarial Trainingcited by 14
  2. 2021Relative stability toward diffeomorphisms indicates performance in deep netscited by 12
  3. 2022Effects of Data Geometry in Early Deep Learningcited by 12
  4. 2023Finite-time Lyapunov exponents of deep neural networkscited by 12
  5. 2025From Kernels to Features: A Multi-Scale Adaptive Theory of Feature Learningcited by 10
  6. 2023Dissecting the Effects of SGD Noise in Distinct Regimes of Deep Learningcited by 9
  7. 2022On the symmetries in the dynamics of wide two-layer neural networkscited by 8
  8. 2022Lazy vs hasty: linearization in deep networks impacts learning schedule based on example difficultycited by 5
  9. 2025Scaling Laws and Representation Learning in Simple Hierarchical Languages: Transformers vs. Convolutional Architecturescited by 5
  10. 2023Learning from higher-order statistics, efficiently: hypothesis tests, random features, and neural networkscited by 3
  11. 2025Geometry of Neural Reinforcement Learning in Continuous State and Action Spacescited by 3
  12. 2025Emergent Riemannian geometry over learning discrete computations on continuous manifoldscited by 3
  13. 2026Geometry-aware similarity metrics for neural representations on Riemannian and statistical manifoldscited by 3
  14. 2025Understanding the role of autoencoders for stiff dynamical systems using information theorycited by 1
  15. 2025Can Biologically Plausible Temporal Credit Assignment Rules Match BPTT for Neural Similarity? E-prop as an Examplecited by 1
  16. 2022On the Geometry of Reinforcement Learning in Continuous State and Action Spacescited by 0