mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Frustratingly Hard Evidence Retrieval for QA Over Books

arXiv 2007.09878 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2020cs.CL cs.IRcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A lot of progress has been made to improve question answering (QA) in recent years, but the special problem of QA over narrative book stories has not been explored in-depth. We formulate BookQA as an open-domain QA task given its similar dependency on evidence retrieval. We further investigate how state-of-the-art open-domain QA approaches can help BookQA. Besides achieving state-of-the-art on the NarrativeQA benchmark, our study also reveals the difficulty of evidence retrieval in books with a wealth of experiments and analysis - which necessitates future effort on novel solutions for evidence retrieval in BookQA.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

7 papers.