Faster Uncertainty Quantification for Inverse Problems with Conditional Normalizing Flows
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In inverse problems, we often have access to data consisting of paired samples (x,y)~ pX,Y(x,y) where y are partial observations of a physical system, and x represents the unknowns of the problem. Under these circumstances, we can employ supervised training to learn a solution x and its uncertainty from the observations y. We refer to this problem as the "supervised" case. However, the data y~ pY(y) collected at one point could be distributed differently than observations y'~ pY'(y'), relevant for a current set of problems. In the context of Bayesian inference, we propose a two-step scheme, which makes use of normalizing flows and joint data to train a conditional generator qθ(x|y) to approximate the target posterior density pX|Y(x|y). Additionally, this preliminary phase provides a density function qθ(x|y), which can be recast as a prior for the "unsupervised" problem, e.g.~when only the observations y'~ pY'(y'), a likelihood model y'|x, and a prior on x' are known. We then train another invertible generator with output density q'φ(x|y') specifically for y', allowing us to sample from the posterior pX|Y'(x|y'). We present some synthetic results that demonstrate considerable training speedup when reusing the pretrained network qθ(x|y') as a warm start or preconditioning for approximating pX|Y'(x|y'), instead of learning from scratch. This training modality can be interpreted as an instance of transfer learning. This result is particularly relevant for large-scale inverse problems that employ expensive numerical simulations.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2021Preconditioned training of normalizing flows for variational inference in inverse problemscited by 19
- 2023Globally injective and bijective neural operatorscited by 13
- 2021Deep Bayesian inference for seismic imaging with taskscited by 12
- 2021Learning by example: fast reliability-aware seismic imaging with normalizing flowscited by 10
- 2022Deep Variational Inverse Scatteringcited by 2
- 2024Robustness and Exploration of Variational and Machine Learning Approaches to Inverse Problems: An Overviewcited by 1
- 2022Deep Invertible Approximation of Topologically Rich Maps between Manifoldscited by 0
- 2026Variational Sparse Paired Autoencoders (vsPAIR) for Inverse Problems and Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 0
- 2026Fine-tuned Normalizing Flows for ALICE Zero Degree Calorimeter Fast Simulationcited by 0
- 2026Fine-tuned Normalizing Flows for ALICE Zero Degree Calorimeter Fast Simulation13 Aug 2026
- 2026Variational Sparse Paired Autoencoders (vsPAIR) for Inverse Problems and Uncertainty Quantification3 Feb 2026
- 2024Robustness and Exploration of Variational and Machine Learning Approaches to Inverse Problems: An Overview19 Feb 2024
- 2023Globally injective and bijective neural operators6 Jun 2023
- 2022Deep Variational Inverse Scattering8 Dec 2022
- 2022Deep Invertible Approximation of Topologically Rich Maps between Manifolds2 Oct 2022
- 2021Deep Bayesian inference for seismic imaging with tasks10 Oct 2021
- 2021Learning by example: fast reliability-aware seismic imaging with normalizing flows13 Apr 2021
- 2021Preconditioned training of normalizing flows for variational inference in inverse problems11 Jan 2021