Are Hyperbolic Representations in Graphs Created Equal?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently there was an increasing interest in applications of graph neural networks in non-Euclidean geometry; however, are non-Euclidean representations always useful for graph learning tasks? For different problems such as node classification and link prediction we compute hyperbolic embeddings and conclude that for tasks that require global prediction consistency it might be useful to use non-Euclidean embeddings, while for other tasks Euclidean models are superior. To do so we first fix an issue of the existing models associated with the optimization process at zero curvature. Current hyperbolic models deal with gradients at the origin in ad-hoc manner, which is inefficient and can lead to numerical instabilities. We solve the instabilities of kappa-Stereographic model at zero curvature cases and evaluate the approach of embedding graphs into the manifold in several graph representation learning tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
4 papers.
- 2021Hyperbolic Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 138
- 2022AMCAD: Adaptive Mixed-Curvature Representation based Advertisement Retrieval Systemcited by 4
- 2023Capacity Bounds for Hyperbolic Neural Network Representations of Latent Tree Structurescited by 4
- 2023Knowledge-based Multiple Adaptive Spaces Fusion for Recommendationcited by 2
- 2023Knowledge-based Multiple Adaptive Spaces Fusion for Recommendation29 Aug 2023
- 2023Capacity Bounds for Hyperbolic Neural Network Representations of Latent Tree Structures18 Aug 2023
- 2022AMCAD: Adaptive Mixed-Curvature Representation based Advertisement Retrieval System28 Mar 2022
- 2021Hyperbolic Deep Neural Networks: A Survey12 Jan 2021