A simple correction for COVID-19 sampling bias
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
COVID-19 testing has become a standard approach for estimating prevalence which then assist in public health decision making to contain and mitigate the spread of the disease. The sampling designs used are often biased in that they do not reflect the true underlying populations. For instance, individuals with strong symptoms are more likely to be tested than those with no symptoms. This results in biased estimates of prevalence (too high). Typical post-sampling corrections are not always possible. Here we present a simple bias correction methodology derived and adapted from a correction for publication bias in meta analysis studies. The methodology is general enough to allow a wide variety of customization making it more useful in practice. Implementation is easily done using already collected information. Via a simulation and two real datasets, we show that the bias corrections can provide dramatic reductions in estimation error.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024Statistical learning does not always entail knowledgecited by 1
- 2024Statistical learning does not always entail knowledge17 Dec 2024