mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Pairwise Fair and Community-preserving Approach to k-Center Clustering

arXiv 2007.07384 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2020cs.LG cs.DS stat.MLcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clustering is a foundational problem in machine learning with numerous applications. As machine learning increases in ubiquity as a backend for automated systems, concerns about fairness arise. Much of the current literature on fairness deals with discrimination against protected classes in supervised learning (group fairness). We define a different notion of fair clustering wherein the probability that two points (or a community of points) become separated is bounded by an increasing function of their pairwise distance (or community diameter). We capture the situation where data points represent people who gain some benefit from being clustered together. Unfairness arises when certain points are deterministically separated, either arbitrarily or by someone who intends to harm them as in the case of gerrymandering election districts. In response, we formally define two new types of fairness in the clustering setting, pairwise fairness and community preservation. To explore the practicality of our fairness goals, we devise an approach for extending existing k-center algorithms to satisfy these fairness constraints. Analysis of this approach proves that reasonable approximations can be achieved while maintaining fairness. In experiments, we compare the effectiveness of our approach to classical k-center algorithms/heuristics and explore the tradeoff between optimal clustering and fairness.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 9; 2022: 7; 2023: 5; 2024: 5.

26 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Approximation Algorithms for Socially Fair Clusteringcited by 25
  2. 2021A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 24
  3. 2021Fair Clustering Under a Bounded Costcited by 21
  4. 2021A New Notion of Individually Fair Clustering: α-Equitable k-Centercited by 18
  5. 2021Fairness, Semi-Supervised Learning, and More: A General Framework for Clustering with Stochastic Pairwise Constraintscited by 17
  6. 2022Deep Fair Clustering via Maximizing and Minimizing Mutual Information: Theory, Algorithm and Metriccited by 17
  7. 2021Approximating Fair Clustering with Cascaded Norm Objectivescited by 13
  8. 2021Deep Fair Discriminative Clusteringcited by 10
  9. 2023Approximation Algorithms for Fair Range Clusteringcited by 10
  10. 2023Doubly Constrained Fair Clusteringcited by 9
  11. 2022Constant-Factor Approximation Algorithms for Socially Fair k-Clusteringcited by 8
  12. 2022Individual Preference Stability for Clusteringcited by 8
14 more
  1. 2023Proportionally Representative Clusteringcited by 8
  2. 2021Efficient Algorithms For Fair Clustering with a New Fairness Notioncited by 5
  3. 2022Fair Representation Clustering with Several Protected Classescited by 4
  4. 2022Generalized Reductions: Making any Hierarchical Clustering Fair and Balanced with Low Costcited by 4
  5. 2023Constant Approximation for Individual Preference Stable Clusteringcited by 3
  6. 2021Fair Disaster Containment via Graph-Cut Problemscited by 2
  7. 2022Fair Labeled Clusteringcited by 2
  8. 2023Fair Polylog-Approximate Low-Cost Hierarchical Clusteringcited by 2
  9. 2024Scalable Algorithms for Individual Preference Stable Clusteringcited by 1
  10. 2024Fair Clustering: Critique, Caveats, and Future Directionscited by 1
  11. 2022Cluster-level Group Representativity Fairness in k-means Clusteringcited by 0
  12. 2024From Discrete to Continuous: Deep Fair Clustering With Transferable Representationscited by 0
  13. 2024A Polynomial-Time Approximation for Pairwise Fair k-Median Clusteringcited by 0
  14. 2024Efficient k-means with Individual Fairness via Exponential Tiltingcited by 0