Our Evaluation Metric Needs an Update to Encourage Generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Models that surpass human performance on several popular benchmarks display significant degradation in performance on exposure to Out of Distribution (OOD) data. Recent research has shown that models overfit to spurious biases and `hack' datasets, in lieu of learning generalizable features like humans. In order to stop the inflation in model performance -- and thus overestimation in AI systems' capabilities -- we propose a simple and novel evaluation metric, WOOD Score, that encourages generalization during evaluation.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 9; 2023: 2.
12 papers.
- 2022NumGLUE: A Suite of Fundamental yet Challenging Mathematical Reasoning Taskscited by 110
- 2022Investigating Selective Prediction Approaches Across Several Tasks in IID, OOD, and Adversarial Settingscited by 66
- 2022Don't Blame the Annotator: Bias Already Starts in the Annotation Instructionscited by 47
- 2021How Robust are Model Rankings: A Leaderboard Customization Approach for Equitable Evaluationcited by 24
- 2022Generalized but not Robust? Comparing the Effects of Data Modification Methods on Out-of-Domain Generalization and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 23
- 2022Choose Your QA Model Wisely: A Systematic Study of Generative and Extractive Readers for Question Answeringcited by 11
- 2022A Proposal to Study "Is High Quality Data All We Need?"cited by 2
- 2022Pretrained Transformers Do not Always Improve Robustnesscited by 2
- 2022A Survey of Parameters Associated with the Quality of Benchmarks in NLPcited by 1
- 2022Investigating the Failure Modes of the AUC metric and Exploring Alternatives for Evaluating Systems in Safety Critical Applicationscited by 0
- 2023Real-Time Visual Feedback to Guide Benchmark Creation: A Human-and-Metric-in-the-Loop Workflowcited by 0
- 2023LINGO : Visually Debiasing Natural Language Instructions to Support Task Diversitycited by 0
- 2023LINGO : Visually Debiasing Natural Language Instructions to Support Task Diversity12 Apr 2023
- 2023Real-Time Visual Feedback to Guide Benchmark Creation: A Human-and-Metric-in-the-Loop Workflow9 Feb 2023
- 2022Pretrained Transformers Do not Always Improve Robustness14 Oct 2022
- 2022A Survey of Parameters Associated with the Quality of Benchmarks in NLP14 Oct 2022
- 2022Investigating the Failure Modes of the AUC metric and Exploring Alternatives for Evaluating Systems in Safety Critical Applications10 Oct 2022
- 2022Don't Blame the Annotator: Bias Already Starts in the Annotation Instructions1 May 2022
- 2022NumGLUE: A Suite of Fundamental yet Challenging Mathematical Reasoning Tasks12 Apr 2022
- 2022Generalized but not Robust? Comparing the Effects of Data Modification Methods on Out-of-Domain Generalization and Adversarial Robustness15 Mar 2022
- 2022Choose Your QA Model Wisely: A Systematic Study of Generative and Extractive Readers for Question Answering14 Mar 2022
- 2022A Proposal to Study "Is High Quality Data All We Need?"12 Mar 2022
- 2022Investigating Selective Prediction Approaches Across Several Tasks in IID, OOD, and Adversarial Settings1 Mar 2022
- 2021How Robust are Model Rankings: A Leaderboard Customization Approach for Equitable Evaluation10 Jun 2021