Bounding The Number of Linear Regions in Local Area for Neural Networks with ReLU Activations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The number of linear regions is one of the distinct properties of the neural networks using piecewise linear activation functions such as ReLU, comparing with those conventional ones using other activation functions. Previous studies showed this property reflected the expressivity of a neural network family ([14]); as a result, it can be used to characterize how the structural complexity of a neural network model affects the function it aims to compute. Nonetheless, it is challenging to directly compute the number of linear regions; therefore, many researchers focus on estimating the bounds (in particular the upper bound) of the number of linear regions for deep neural networks using ReLU. These methods, however, attempted to estimate the upper bound in the entire input space. The theoretical methods are still lacking to estimate the number of linear regions within a specific area of the input space, e.g., a sphere centered at a training data point such as an adversarial example or a backdoor trigger. In this paper, we present the first method to estimate the upper bound of the number of linear regions in any sphere in the input space of a given ReLU neural network. We implemented the method, and computed the bounds in deep neural networks using the piece-wise linear active function. Our experiments showed that, while training a neural network, the boundaries of the linear regions tend to move away from the training data points. In addition, we observe that the spheres centered at the training data points tend to contain more linear regions than any arbitrary points in the input space. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of bounding linear regions around a specific data point. We consider our work as a first step toward the investigation of the structural complexity of deep neural networks in a specific input area.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023When Deep Learning Meets Polyhedral Theory: A Surveycited by 39
- 2023Exact Count of Boundary Pieces of ReLU Classifiers: Towards the Proper Complexity Measure for Classificationcited by 11
- 2024On the Local Complexity of Linear Regions in Deep ReLU Networkscited by 9
- 2021Neural networks behave as hash encoders: An empirical studycited by 3
- 2024On the Local Complexity of Linear Regions in Deep ReLU Networks24 Dec 2024
- 2023Exact Count of Boundary Pieces of ReLU Classifiers: Towards the Proper Complexity Measure for Classification15 Jun 2023
- 2023When Deep Learning Meets Polyhedral Theory: A Survey29 Apr 2023
- 2021Neural networks behave as hash encoders: An empirical study14 Jan 2021