Landslide Segmentation with U-Net: Evaluating Different Sampling Methods and Patch Sizes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Landslide inventory maps are crucial to validate predictive landslide models; however, since most mapping methods rely on visual interpretation or expert knowledge, detailed inventory maps are still lacking. This study used a fully convolutional deep learning model named U-net to automatically segment landslides in the city of Nova Friburgo, located in the mountainous range of Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil. The objective was to evaluate the impact of patch sizes, sampling methods, and datasets on the overall accuracy of the models. The training data used the optical information from RapidEye satellite, and a digital elevation model (DEM) derived from the L-band sensor of the ALOS satellite. The data was sampled using random and regular grid methods and patched in three sizes (32x32, 64x64, and 128x128 pixels). The models were evaluated on two areas with precision, recall, f1-score, and mean intersect over union (mIoU) metrics. The results show that the models trained with 32x32 tiles tend to have higher recall values due to higher true positive rates; however, they misclassify more background areas as landslides (false positives). Models trained with 128x128 tiles usually achieve higher precision values because they make less false positive errors. In both test areas, DEM and augmentation increased the accuracy of the models. Random sampling helped in model generalization. Models trained with 128x128 random tiles from the data that used the RapidEye image, DEM information, and augmentation achieved the highest f1-score, 0.55 in test area one, and 0.58 in test area two. The results achieved in this study are comparable to other fully convolutional models found in the literature, increasing the knowledge in the area.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Landslide4Sense: Reference Benchmark Data and Deep Learning Models for Landslide Detectioncited by 26
- 2023An Iterative Classification and Semantic Segmentation Network for Old Landslide Detection Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagescited by 5
- 2024TransLandSeg: A Transfer Learning Approach for Landslide Semantic Segmentation Based on Vision Foundation Modelcited by 2
- 2024Comparing Deep Learning Models for Rice Mapping in Bhutan Using High Resolution Satellite Imagerycited by 0
- 2024MRIFE: A Mask-Recovering and Interactive-Feature-Enhancing Semantic Segmentation Network For Relic Landslide Detectioncited by 0
- 2025A Deep-Learning Framework for Land-Sliding Classification from Remote Sensing Imagecited by 0
- 2025A Deep-Learning Framework for Land-Sliding Classification from Remote Sensing Image17 Jul 2025
- 2024MRIFE: A Mask-Recovering and Interactive-Feature-Enhancing Semantic Segmentation Network For Relic Landslide Detection26 Nov 2024
- 2024Comparing Deep Learning Models for Rice Mapping in Bhutan Using High Resolution Satellite Imagery11 Jun 2024
- 2024TransLandSeg: A Transfer Learning Approach for Landslide Semantic Segmentation Based on Vision Foundation Model15 Mar 2024
- 2023An Iterative Classification and Semantic Segmentation Network for Old Landslide Detection Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images24 Feb 2023
- 2022Landslide4Sense: Reference Benchmark Data and Deep Learning Models for Landslide Detection1 Jun 2022