Lessons Learned from the Training of GANs on Artificial Datasets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have made great progress in synthesizing realistic images in recent years. However, they are often trained on image datasets with either too few samples or too many classes belonging to different data distributions. Consequently, GANs are prone to underfitting or overfitting, making the analysis of them difficult and constrained. Therefore, in order to conduct a thorough study on GANs while obviating unnecessary interferences introduced by the datasets, we train them on artificial datasets where there are infinitely many samples and the real data distributions are simple, high-dimensional and have structured manifolds. Moreover, the generators are designed such that optimal sets of parameters exist. Empirically, we find that under various distance measures, the generator fails to learn such parameters with the GAN training procedure. We also find that training mixtures of GANs leads to more performance gain compared to increasing the network depth or width when the model complexity is high enough. Our experimental results demonstrate that a mixture of generators can discover different modes or different classes automatically in an unsupervised setting, which we attribute to the distribution of the generation and discrimination tasks across multiple generators and discriminators. As an example of the generalizability of our conclusions to realistic datasets, we train a mixture of GANs on the CIFAR-10 dataset and our method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art in terms of popular metrics, i.e., Inception Score (IS) and Fr'echet Inception Distance (FID).
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023SequenceMatch: Imitation Learning for Autoregressive Sequence Modelling with Backtrackingcited by 13
- 2021Reparameterized Sampling for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2
- 2021The Nuts and Bolts of Adopting Transformer in GANscited by 2
- 2024Addressing Small and Imbalanced Medical Image Datasets Using Generative Models: A Comparative Study of DDPM and PGGANs with Random and Greedy K Samplingcited by 2
- 2021Towards convergence to Nash equilibria in two-team zero-sum gamescited by 1
- 2024Addressing Small and Imbalanced Medical Image Datasets Using Generative Models: A Comparative Study of DDPM and PGGANs with Random and Greedy K Sampling17 Dec 2024
- 2023SequenceMatch: Imitation Learning for Autoregressive Sequence Modelling with Backtracking8 Jun 2023
- 2021Towards convergence to Nash equilibria in two-team zero-sum games7 Nov 2021
- 2021The Nuts and Bolts of Adopting Transformer in GANs25 Oct 2021
- 2021Reparameterized Sampling for Generative Adversarial Networks1 Jul 2021