Fisher Auto-Encoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It has been conjectured that the Fisher divergence is more robust to model uncertainty than the conventional Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. This motivates the design of a new class of robust generative auto-encoders (AE) referred to as Fisher auto-encoders. Our approach is to design Fisher AEs by minimizing the Fisher divergence between the intractable joint distribution of observed data and latent variables, with that of the postulated/modeled joint distribution. In contrast to KL-based variational AEs (VAEs), the Fisher AE can exactly quantify the distance between the true and the model-based posterior distributions. Qualitative and quantitative results are provided on both MNIST and celebA datasets demonstrating the competitive performance of Fisher AEs in terms of robustness compared to other AEs such as VAEs and Wasserstein AEs.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023Semi-Implicit Variational Inference via Score Matchingcited by 19
- 2023Controlling Posterior Collapse by an Inverse Lipschitz Constraint on the Decoder Networkcited by 7
- 2021Fast approximations of the Jeffreys divergence between univariate Gaussian mixture models via exponential polynomial densitiescited by 3
- 2021Probabilistic Autoencoder using Fisher Informationcited by 3
- 2022On the failure of variational score matching for VAE modelscited by 2
- 2023Semi-Implicit Variational Inference via Score Matching19 Aug 2023
- 2023Controlling Posterior Collapse by an Inverse Lipschitz Constraint on the Decoder Network25 Apr 2023
- 2022On the failure of variational score matching for VAE models24 Oct 2022
- 2021Probabilistic Autoencoder using Fisher Information28 Oct 2021
- 2021Fast approximations of the Jeffreys divergence between univariate Gaussian mixture models via exponential polynomial densities13 Jul 2021