mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Entanglement and Tensor Networks for Supervised Image Classification

arXiv 2007.06082 ↗First posted 12 Jul 2020quant-ph cs.LG stat.MLcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tensor networks, originally designed to address computational problems in quantum many-body physics, have recently been applied to machine learning tasks. However, compared to quantum physics, where the reasons for the success of tensor network approaches over the last 30 years is well understood, very little is yet known about why these techniques work for machine learning. The goal of this paper is to investigate entanglement properties of tensor network models in a current machine learning application, in order to uncover general principles that may guide future developments. We revisit the use of tensor networks for supervised image classification using the MNIST data set of handwritten digits, as pioneered by Stoudenmire and Schwab [Adv. in Neur. Inform. Proc. Sys. 29, 4799 (2016)]. Firstly we hypothesize about which state the tensor network might be learning during training. For that purpose, we propose a plausible candidate state |Sigmaℓrangle (built as a superposition of product states corresponding to images in the training set) and investigate its entanglement properties. We conclude that |Sigmaℓrangle is so robustly entangled that it cannot be approximated by the tensor network used in that work, which must therefore be representing a very different state. Secondly, we use tensor networks with a block product structure, in which entanglement is restricted within small blocks of n × n pixels/qubits. We find that these states are extremely expressive (e.g. training accuracy of 99.97 % already for n=2), suggesting that long-range entanglement may not be essential for image classification. However, in our current implementation, optimization leads to over-fitting, resulting in test accuracies that are not competitive with other current approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 5; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Grokking phase transitions in learning local rules with gradient descentcited by 28
  2. 2022Generative modeling with projected entangled-pair statescited by 16
  3. 2023Machine learning with tree tensor networks, CP rank constraints, and tensor dropoutcited by 15
  4. 2021DISP6D: Disentangled Implicit Shape and Pose Learning for Scalable 6D Pose Estimationcited by 12
  5. 2021Quantum-inspired event reconstruction with Tensor Networks: Matrix Product Statescited by 9
  6. 2023Generative Learning of Continuous Data by Tensor Networkscited by 9
  7. 2022Classical versus Quantum: comparing Tensor Network-based Quantum Circuits on LHC datacited by 7
  8. 2023TensorKrowch: Smooth integration of tensor networks in machine learningcited by 5
  9. 2025tn4ml: Tensor Network Training and Customization for Machine Learningcited by 5
  10. 2025ATP: Adaptive Threshold Pruning for Efficient Data Encoding in Quantum Neural Networkscited by 5
  11. 2021Tensor network to learn the wavefunction of datacited by 4
  12. 2023What Makes Data Suitable for a Locally Connected Neural Network? A Necessary and Sufficient Condition Based on Quantum Entanglementcited by 4
6 more
  1. 2022Generalization and Overfitting in Matrix Product State Machine Learning Architecturescited by 3
  2. 2021Differentiable Programming of Isometric Tensor Networkscited by 2
  3. 2022Deep tensor networks with matrix product operatorscited by 2
  4. 2023Distributive Pre-Training of Generative Modeling Using Matrix-Product Statescited by 2
  5. 2024Using matrix-product states for time-series machine learningcited by 2
  6. 2024Entangling Machine Learning with Quantum Tensor Networkscited by 0