mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

It Is Likely That Your Loss Should be a Likelihood

arXiv 2007.06059 ↗First posted 12 Jul 2020cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many common loss functions such as mean-squared-error, cross-entropy, and reconstruction loss are unnecessarily rigid. Under a probabilistic interpretation, these common losses correspond to distributions with fixed shapes and scales. We instead argue for optimizing full likelihoods that include parameters like the normal variance and softmax temperature. Joint optimization of these "likelihood parameters" with model parameters can adaptively tune the scales and shapes of losses in addition to the strength of regularization. We explore and systematically evaluate how to parameterize and apply likelihood parameters for robust modeling, outlier-detection, and re-calibration. Additionally, we propose adaptively tuning L2 and L1 weights by fitting the scale parameters of normal and Laplace priors and introduce more flexible element-wise regularizers.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

5 papers.