EPI-based Oriented Relation Networks for Light Field Depth Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Light field cameras record not only the spatial information of observed scenes but also the directions of all incoming light rays. The spatial and angular information implicitly contain geometrical characteristics such as multi-view or epipolar geometry, which can be exploited to improve the performance of depth estimation. An Epipolar Plane Image (EPI), the unique 2D spatial-angular slice of the light field, contains patterns of oriented lines. The slope of these lines is associated with the disparity. Benefiting from this property of EPIs, some representative methods estimate depth maps by analyzing the disparity of each line in EPIs. However, these methods often extract the optimal slope of the lines from EPIs while ignoring the relationship between neighboring pixels, which leads to inaccurate depth map predictions. Based on the observation that an oriented line and its neighboring pixels in an EPI share a similar linear structure, we propose an end-to-end fully convolutional network (FCN) to estimate the depth value of the intersection point on the horizontal and vertical EPIs. Specifically, we present a new feature-extraction module, called Oriented Relation Module (ORM), that constructs the relationship between the line orientations. To facilitate training, we also propose a refocusing-based data augmentation method to obtain different slopes from EPIs of the same scene point. Extensive experiments verify the efficacy of learning relations and show that our approach is competitive to other state-of-the-art methods. The code and the trained models are available at https://github.com/lkyahpu/EPI_ORM.git.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2022Disentangling Light Fields for Super-Resolution and Disparity Estimationcited by 42
- 2022Occlusion-Aware Cost Constructor for Light Field Depth Estimationcited by 23
- 2022Learning Sub-Pixel Disparity Distribution for Light Field Depth Estimationcited by 12
- 2021Edge-aware Bidirectional Diffusion for Dense Depth Estimation from Light Fieldscited by 5
- 2021Differentiable Diffusion for Dense Depth Estimation from Multi-view Imagescited by 4
- 2024Iterative approach to reconstructing neural disparity fields from light-field datacited by 2
- 2023Blur aware metric depth estimation with multi-focus plenoptic camerascited by 1
- 2022Self-Supervised Light Field Depth Estimation Using Epipolar Plane Imagescited by 0
- 2024Iterative Occlusion-Aware Light Field Depth Estimation using 4D Geometrical Cuescited by 0
- 2026Frequency-Structured Field Learning for Light-Field Disparity Estimationcited by 0
- 2026Frequency-Structured Field Learning for Light-Field Disparity Estimation16 Jul 2026
- 2024Iterative approach to reconstructing neural disparity fields from light-field data22 Jul 2024
- 2024Iterative Occlusion-Aware Light Field Depth Estimation using 4D Geometrical Cues4 Mar 2024
- 2023Blur aware metric depth estimation with multi-focus plenoptic cameras8 Aug 2023
- 2022Learning Sub-Pixel Disparity Distribution for Light Field Depth Estimation20 Aug 2022
- 2022Self-Supervised Light Field Depth Estimation Using Epipolar Plane Images29 Mar 2022
- 2022Occlusion-Aware Cost Constructor for Light Field Depth Estimation3 Mar 2022
- 2022Disentangling Light Fields for Super-Resolution and Disparity Estimation22 Feb 2022
- 2021Edge-aware Bidirectional Diffusion for Dense Depth Estimation from Light Fields7 Jul 2021
- 2021Differentiable Diffusion for Dense Depth Estimation from Multi-view Images16 Jun 2021