RobFR: Benchmarking Adversarial Robustness on Face Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Face recognition (FR) has recently made substantial progress and achieved high accuracy on standard benchmarks. However, it has raised security concerns in enormous FR applications because deep CNNs are unusually vulnerable to adversarial examples, and it is still lack of a comprehensive robustness evaluation before a FR model is deployed in safety-critical scenarios. To facilitate a better understanding of the adversarial vulnerability on FR, we develop an adversarial robustness evaluation library on FR named RobFR, which serves as a reference for evaluating the robustness of downstream tasks. Specifically, RobFR involves 15 popular naturally trained FR models, 9 models with representative defense mechanisms and 2 commercial FR API services, to perform the robustness evaluation by using various adversarial attacks as an important surrogate. The evaluations are conducted under diverse adversarial settings in terms of dodging and impersonation, ℓ2 and ℓ_∞, as well as white-box and black-box attacks. We further propose a landmark-guided cutout (LGC) attack method to improve the transferability of adversarial examples for black-box attacks by considering the special characteristics of FR. Based on large-scale evaluations, the commercial FR API services fail to exhibit acceptable performance on robustness evaluation, and we also draw several important conclusions for understanding the adversarial robustness of FR models and providing insights for the design of robust FR models. RobFR is open-source and maintains all extendable modules, i.e., Datasets, FR Models, Attacks&Defenses, and Evaluations at urlhttps://github.com/ShawnXYang/Face-Robustness-Benchmark, which will be continuously updated to promote future research on robust FR.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 5.
10 papers.
- 2023Towards Effective Adversarial Textured 3D Meshes on Physical Face Recognitioncited by 33
- 2022Controllable Evaluation and Generation of Physical Adversarial Patch on Face Recognitioncited by 8
- 2024Rethinking Impersonation and Dodging Attacks on Face Recognition Systemscited by 7
- 2023Face Encryption via Frequency-Restricted Identity-Agnostic Attackscited by 6
- 2025FaceSwapGuard: Safeguarding Facial Privacy from DeepFake Threats through Identity Obfuscationcited by 4
- 2024OODFace: Benchmarking Robustness of Face Recognition under Common Corruptions and Appearance Variationscited by 2
- 2025Non-Adaptive Adversarial Face Generationcited by 2
- 2025Attention-aggregated Attack for Boosting the Transferability of Facial Adversarial Examplescited by 0
- 2025Backdoor Poisoning Attack Against Face Spoofing Attack Detection Methodscited by 0
- 2025Investigating Adversarial Robustness against Preprocessing used in Blackbox Face Recognitioncited by 0
- 2025Investigating Adversarial Robustness against Preprocessing used in Blackbox Face Recognition20 Oct 2025
- 2025Backdoor Poisoning Attack Against Face Spoofing Attack Detection Methods3 Sep 2025
- 2025Non-Adaptive Adversarial Face Generation16 Jul 2025
- 2025Attention-aggregated Attack for Boosting the Transferability of Facial Adversarial Examples6 May 2025
- 2025FaceSwapGuard: Safeguarding Facial Privacy from DeepFake Threats through Identity Obfuscation15 Feb 2025
- 2024OODFace: Benchmarking Robustness of Face Recognition under Common Corruptions and Appearance Variations3 Dec 2024
- 2024Rethinking Impersonation and Dodging Attacks on Face Recognition Systems17 Jan 2024
- 2023Face Encryption via Frequency-Restricted Identity-Agnostic Attacks11 Aug 2023
- 2023Towards Effective Adversarial Textured 3D Meshes on Physical Face Recognition28 Mar 2023
- 2022Controllable Evaluation and Generation of Physical Adversarial Patch on Face Recognition9 Mar 2022