Humans-as-a-sensor for buildings: Intensive longitudinal indoor comfort models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating and optimising human comfort within the built environment is challenging due to the large number of physiological, psychological and environmental variables that affect occupant comfort preference. Human perception could be helpful to capture these disparate phenomena and interpreting their impact; the challenge is collecting spatially and temporally diverse subjective feedback in a scalable way. This paper presents a methodology to collect intensive longitudinal subjective feedback of comfort-based preference using micro ecological momentary assessments on a smartwatch platform. An experiment with 30 occupants over two weeks produced 4,378 field-based surveys for thermal, noise, and acoustic preference. The occupants and the spaces in which they left feedback were then clustered according to these preference tendencies. These groups were used to create different feature sets with combinations of environmental and physiological variables, for use in a multi-class classification task. These classification models were trained on a feature set that was developed from time-series attributes, environmental and near-body sensors, heart rate, and the historical preferences of both the individual and the comfort group assigned. The most accurate model had multi-class classification F1 micro scores of 64%, 80% and 86% for thermal, light, and noise preference, respectively. The discussion outlines how these models can enhance comfort preference prediction when supplementing data from installed sensors. The approach presented prompts reflection on how the building analysis community evaluates, controls, and designs indoor environments through balancing the measurement of variables with strategically asking for occupant preferences in an intensive longitudinal way.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2.
5 papers.
- 2021Limitations of machine learning for building energy prediction: ASHRAE Great Energy Predictor III Kaggle competition error analysiscited by 5
- 2021Personal thermal comfort models using digital twins: Preference prediction with BIM-extracted spatial-temporal proximity data from Build2Veccited by 4
- 2021Using Google Trends as a proxy for occupant behavior to predict building energy consumptioncited by 4
- 2022Targeting occupant feedback using digital twins: Adaptive spatial-temporal thermal preference sampling to optimize personal comfort modelscited by 3
- 2022Cohort comfort models -- Using occupants' similarity to predict personal thermal preference with less datacited by 2
- 2022Cohort comfort models -- Using occupants' similarity to predict personal thermal preference with less data5 Aug 2022
- 2022Targeting occupant feedback using digital twins: Adaptive spatial-temporal thermal preference sampling to optimize personal comfort models22 Feb 2022
- 2021Using Google Trends as a proxy for occupant behavior to predict building energy consumption31 Oct 2021
- 2021Personal thermal comfort models using digital twins: Preference prediction with BIM-extracted spatial-temporal proximity data from Build2Vec30 Oct 2021
- 2021Limitations of machine learning for building energy prediction: ASHRAE Great Energy Predictor III Kaggle competition error analysis25 Jun 2021