On Convergence-Diagnostic based Step Sizes for Stochastic Gradient Descent
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Constant step-size Stochastic Gradient Descent exhibits two phases: a transient phase during which iterates make fast progress towards the optimum, followed by a stationary phase during which iterates oscillate around the optimal point. In this paper, we show that efficiently detecting this transition and appropriately decreasing the step size can lead to fast convergence rates. We analyse the classical statistical test proposed by Pflug (1983), based on the inner product between consecutive stochastic gradients. Even in the simple case where the objective function is quadratic we show that this test cannot lead to an adequate convergence diagnostic. We then propose a novel and simple statistical procedure that accurately detects stationarity and we provide experimental results showing state-of-the-art performance on synthetic and real-world datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021SVRG Meets AdaGrad: Painless Variance Reductioncited by 13
- 2021Stochastic Reweighted Gradient Descentcited by 7
- 2024On the Convergence of Federated Learning Algorithms without Data Similaritycited by 2
- 2025Almost Bayesian: The Fractal Dynamics of Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 2
- 2025AutoSGD: Automatic Learning Rate Selection for Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 1
- 2021Adaptive Learning Rate and Momentum for Training Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2022Cost-Efficient Distributed Learning via Combinatorial Multi-Armed Banditscited by 0
- 2023Fast and Straggler-Tolerant Distributed SGD with Reduced Computation Loadcited by 0
- 2024Beyond Discretization: Learning the Optimal Solution Pathcited by 0
- 2024Coupling-based Convergence Diagnostic and Stepsize Scheme for Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 0
- 2026Trust, but Verify: Peeling Low-Bit Transformer Networks for Training Monitoringcited by 0
- 2026Trust, but Verify: Peeling Low-Bit Transformer Networks for Training Monitoring4 May 2026
- 2025AutoSGD: Automatic Learning Rate Selection for Stochastic Gradient Descent27 May 2025
- 2025Almost Bayesian: The Fractal Dynamics of Stochastic Gradient Descent28 Mar 2025
- 2024Coupling-based Convergence Diagnostic and Stepsize Scheme for Stochastic Gradient Descent15 Dec 2024
- 2024Beyond Discretization: Learning the Optimal Solution Path18 Oct 2024
- 2024On the Convergence of Federated Learning Algorithms without Data Similarity29 Feb 2024
- 2023Fast and Straggler-Tolerant Distributed SGD with Reduced Computation Load17 Apr 2023
- 2022Cost-Efficient Distributed Learning via Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandits16 Feb 2022
- 2021Adaptive Learning Rate and Momentum for Training Deep Neural Networks22 Jun 2021
- 2021Stochastic Reweighted Gradient Descent23 Mar 2021
- 2021SVRG Meets AdaGrad: Painless Variance Reduction18 Feb 2021