mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Maat: Automatically Analyzing VirusTotal for Accurate Labeling and Effective Malware Detection

arXiv 2007.00510 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2020cs.CR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The malware analysis and detection research community relies on the online platform VirusTotal to label Android apps based on the scan results of around 60 antiviral scanners. Unfortunately, there are no standards on how to best interpret the scan results acquired from VirusTotal, which leads to the utilization of different threshold-based labeling strategies (e.g., if ten or more scanners deem an app malicious, it is considered malicious). While some of the utilized thresholds may be able to accurately approximate the ground truths of apps, the fact that VirusTotal changes the set and versions of the scanners it uses makes such thresholds unsustainable over time. We implemented a method, Maat, that tackles these issues of standardization and sustainability by automatically generating a Machine Learning (ML)-based labeling scheme, which outperforms threshold-based labeling strategies. Using the VirusTotal scan reports of 53K Android apps that span one year, we evaluated the applicability of Maat's ML-based labeling strategies by comparing their performance against threshold-based strategies. We found that such ML-based strategies (a) can accurately and consistently label apps based on their VirusTotal scan reports, and (b) contribute to training ML-based detection methods that are more effective at classifying out-of-sample apps than their threshold-based counterparts.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.