Guarantees for Tuning the Step Size using a Learning-to-Learn Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Choosing the right parameters for optimization algorithms is often the key to their success in practice. Solving this problem using a learning-to-learn approach -- using meta-gradient descent on a meta-objective based on the trajectory that the optimizer generates -- was recently shown to be effective. However, the meta-optimization problem is difficult. In particular, the meta-gradient can often explode/vanish, and the learned optimizer may not have good generalization performance if the meta-objective is not chosen carefully. In this paper we give meta-optimization guarantees for the learning-to-learn approach on a simple problem of tuning the step size for quadratic loss. Our results show that the na"ive objective suffers from meta-gradient explosion/vanishing problem. Although there is a way to design the meta-objective so that the meta-gradient remains polynomially bounded, computing the meta-gradient directly using backpropagation leads to numerical issues. We also characterize when it is necessary to compute the meta-objective on a separate validation set to ensure the generalization performance of the learned optimizer. Finally, we verify our results empirically and show that a similar phenomenon appears even for more complicated learned optimizers parametrized by neural networks.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmarkcited by 206
- 2023Learning-Rate-Free Learning by D-Adaptationcited by 113
- 2021Federated Hyperparameter Tuning: Challenges, Baselines, and Connections to Weight-Sharingcited by 58
- 2023Fast Trainable Projection for Robust Fine-Tuningcited by 18
- 2021Learning-to-learn non-convex piecewise-Lipschitz functionscited by 15
- 2021Generalization Guarantees for Neural Architecture Search with Train-Validation Splitcited by 14
- 2021A Representation Learning Perspective on the Importance of Train-Validation Splitting in Meta-Learningcited by 12
- 2024Rethinking Weight Decay for Robust Fine-Tuning of Foundation Modelscited by 9
- 2023A Nonstochastic Control Approach to Optimizationcited by 4
- 2024From Learning to Optimize to Learning Optimization Algorithmscited by 2
- 2024Rethinking Weight Decay for Robust Fine-Tuning of Foundation Models3 Nov 2024
- 2024From Learning to Optimize to Learning Optimization Algorithms28 May 2024
- 2023Fast Trainable Projection for Robust Fine-Tuning29 Oct 2023
- 2023A Nonstochastic Control Approach to Optimization19 Jan 2023
- 2023Learning-Rate-Free Learning by D-Adaptation18 Jan 2023
- 2021Learning-to-learn non-convex piecewise-Lipschitz functions19 Aug 2021
- 2021A Representation Learning Perspective on the Importance of Train-Validation Splitting in Meta-Learning29 Jun 2021
- 2021Federated Hyperparameter Tuning: Challenges, Baselines, and Connections to Weight-Sharing8 Jun 2021
- 2021Generalization Guarantees for Neural Architecture Search with Train-Validation Split29 Apr 2021
- 2021Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmark23 Mar 2021