MCAL: Minimum Cost Human-Machine Active Labeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Today, ground-truth generation uses data sets annotated by cloud-based annotation services. These services rely on human annotation, which can be prohibitively expensive. In this paper, we consider the problem of hybrid human-machine labeling, which trains a classifier to accurately auto-label part of the data set. However, training the classifier can be expensive too. We propose an iterative approach that minimizes total overall cost by, at each step, jointly determining which samples to label using humans and which to label using the trained classifier. We validate our approach on well known public data sets such as Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet. In some cases, our approach has 6x lower overall cost relative to human labeling the entire data set, and is always cheaper than the cheapest competing strategy.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Probably Approximately Correct Labels12 Jun 2025
- 2024SciLitLLM: How to Adapt LLMs for Scientific Literature Understanding28 Aug 2024
- 2024Pearls from Pebbles: Improved Confidence Functions for Auto-labeling24 Apr 2024