mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MCAL: Minimum Cost Human-Machine Active Labeling

arXiv 2006.13999 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2020cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Today, ground-truth generation uses data sets annotated by cloud-based annotation services. These services rely on human annotation, which can be prohibitively expensive. In this paper, we consider the problem of hybrid human-machine labeling, which trains a classifier to accurately auto-label part of the data set. However, training the classifier can be expensive too. We propose an iterative approach that minimizes total overall cost by, at each step, jointly determining which samples to label using humans and which to label using the trained classifier. We validate our approach on well known public data sets such as Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet. In some cases, our approach has 6x lower overall cost relative to human labeling the entire data set, and is always cheaper than the cheapest competing strategy.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.