Classifying Referential and Non-referential It Using Gaze
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When processing a text, humans and machines must disambiguate between different uses of the pronoun it, including non-referential, nominal anaphoric or clause anaphoric ones. In this paper, we use eye-tracking data to learn how humans perform this disambiguation. We use this knowledge to improve the automatic classification of it. We show that by using gaze data and a POS-tagger we are able to significantly outperform a common baseline and classify between three categories of it with an accuracy comparable to that of linguisticbased approaches. In addition, the discriminatory power of specific gaze features informs the way humans process the pronoun, which, to the best of our knowledge, has not been explored using data from a natural reading task.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024EyeTrans: Merging Human and Machine Attention for Neural Code Summarizationcited by 9
- 2021Cognition-aware Cognate Detectioncited by 3
- 2024EyeTrans: Merging Human and Machine Attention for Neural Code Summarization21 Feb 2024
- 2021Cognition-aware Cognate Detection15 Dec 2021