Flood severity mapping from Volunteered Geographic Information by interpreting water level from images containing people: a case study of Hurricane Harvey
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With increasing urbanization, in recent years there has been a growing interest and need in monitoring and analyzing urban flood events. Social media, as a new data source, can provide real-time information for flood monitoring. The social media posts with locations are often referred to as Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI), which can reveal the spatial pattern of such events. Since more images are shared on social media than ever before, recent research focused on the extraction of flood-related posts by analyzing images in addition to texts. Apart from merely classifying posts as flood relevant or not, more detailed information, e.g. the flood severity, can also be extracted based on image interpretation. However, it has been less tackled and has not yet been applied for flood severity mapping. In this paper, we propose a novel three-step process to extract and map flood severity information. First, flood relevant images are retrieved with the help of pre-trained convolutional neural networks as feature extractors. Second, the images containing people are further classified into four severity levels by observing the relationship between body parts and their partial inundation, i.e. images are classified according to the water level with respect to different body parts, namely ankle, knee, hip, and chest. Lastly, locations of the Tweets are used for generating a map of estimated flood extent and severity. This process was applied to an image dataset collected during Hurricane Harvey in 2017, as a proof of concept. The results show that VGI can be used as a supplement to remote sensing observations for flood extent mapping and is beneficial, especially for urban areas, where the infrastructure is often occluding water. Based on the extracted water level information, an integrated overview of flood severity can be provided for the early stages of emergency response.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3.
6 papers.
- 2024Cross-View Geolocalization and Disaster Mapping with Street-View and VHR Satellite Imagery: A Case Study of Hurricane IANcited by 22
- 2022Determination of building flood risk maps from LiDAR mobile mapping datacited by 4
- 2024Infrastructure Ombudsman: Mining Future Failure Concerns from Structural Disaster Responsecited by 4
- 2024Automated Floodwater Depth Estimation Using Large Multimodal Model for Rapid Flood Mappingcited by 4
- 2021Deep Sensing of Urban Waterloggingcited by 2
- 2022An Objective Method for Pedestrian Occlusion Level Classificationcited by 1
- 2024Cross-View Geolocalization and Disaster Mapping with Street-View and VHR Satellite Imagery: A Case Study of Hurricane IAN13 Aug 2024
- 2024Automated Floodwater Depth Estimation Using Large Multimodal Model for Rapid Flood Mapping26 Feb 2024
- 2024Infrastructure Ombudsman: Mining Future Failure Concerns from Structural Disaster Response21 Feb 2024
- 2022An Objective Method for Pedestrian Occlusion Level Classification11 May 2022
- 2022Determination of building flood risk maps from LiDAR mobile mapping data14 Jan 2022
- 2021Deep Sensing of Urban Waterlogging10 Mar 2021