A numerical framework for elastic surface matching, comparison, and interpolation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Surface comparison and matching is a challenging problem in computer vision. While reparametrization-invariant Sobolev metrics provide meaningful elastic distances and point correspondences via the geodesic boundary value problem, solving this problem numerically tends to be difficult. Square root normal fields (SRNF) considerably simplify the computation of certain elastic distances between parametrized surfaces. Yet they leave open the issue of finding optimal reparametrizations, which induce elastic distances between unparametrized surfaces. This issue has concentrated much effort in recent years and led to the development of several numerical frameworks. In this paper, we take an alternative approach which bypasses the direct estimation of reparametrizations: we relax the geodesic boundary constraint using an auxiliary parametrization-blind varifold fidelity metric. This reformulation has several notable benefits. By avoiding altogether the need for reparametrizations, it provides the flexibility to deal with simplicial meshes of arbitrary topologies and sampling patterns. Moreover, the problem lends itself to a coarse-to-fine multi-resolution implementation, which makes the algorithm scalable to large meshes. Furthermore, this approach extends readily to higher-order feature maps such as square root curvature fields and is also able to include surface textures in the matching problem. We demonstrate these advantages on several examples, synthetic and real.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
8 papers.
- 2022Elastic shape analysis of surfaces with second-order Sobolev metrics: a comprehensive numerical frameworkcited by 18
- 20214D Atlas: Statistical Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Variability in Longitudinal 3D Shape Datacited by 8
- 20223D Shape Sequence of Human Comparison and Classification using Current and Varifoldscited by 8
- 2022BaRe-ESA: A Riemannian Framework for Unregistered Human Body Shapescited by 7
- 2023Basis restricted elastic shape analysis on the space of unregistered surfacescited by 5
- 2024Neural varifolds: an aggregate representation for quantifying the geometry of point cloudscited by 1
- 2025ARC-Flow : Articulated, Resolution-Agnostic, Correspondence-Free Matching and Interpolation of 3D Shapes Under Flow Fieldscited by 1
- 2023Geodesic Regression Characterizes 3D Shape Changes in the Female Brain During Menstruationcited by 0
- 2025ARC-Flow : Articulated, Resolution-Agnostic, Correspondence-Free Matching and Interpolation of 3D Shapes Under Flow Fields4 Mar 2025
- 2024Neural varifolds: an aggregate representation for quantifying the geometry of point clouds5 Jul 2024
- 2023Basis restricted elastic shape analysis on the space of unregistered surfaces7 Nov 2023
- 2023Geodesic Regression Characterizes 3D Shape Changes in the Female Brain During Menstruation28 Sep 2023
- 2022BaRe-ESA: A Riemannian Framework for Unregistered Human Body Shapes23 Nov 2022
- 20223D Shape Sequence of Human Comparison and Classification using Current and Varifolds25 Jul 2022
- 2022Elastic shape analysis of surfaces with second-order Sobolev metrics: a comprehensive numerical framework8 Apr 2022
- 20214D Atlas: Statistical Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Variability in Longitudinal 3D Shape Data23 Jan 2021