mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The MCC-F1 curve: a performance evaluation technique for binary classification

arXiv 2006.11278 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2020stat.ML cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many fields use the ROC curve and the PR curve as standard evaluations of binary classification methods. Analysis of ROC and PR, however, often gives misleading and inflated performance evaluations, especially with an imbalanced ground truth. Here, we demonstrate the problems with ROC and PR analysis through simulations, and propose the MCC-F1 curve to address these drawbacks. The MCC-F1 curve combines two informative single-threshold metrics, MCC and the F1 score. The MCC-F1 curve more clearly differentiates good and bad classifiers, even with imbalanced ground truths. We also introduce the MCC-F1 metric, which provides a single value that integrates many aspects of classifier performance across the whole range of classification thresholds. Finally, we provide an R package that plots MCC-F1 curves and calculates related metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.