Classifier uncertainty: evidence, potential impact, and probabilistic treatment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Classifiers are often tested on relatively small data sets, which should lead to uncertain performance metrics. Nevertheless, these metrics are usually taken at face value. We present an approach to quantify the uncertainty of classification performance metrics, based on a probability model of the confusion matrix. Application of our approach to classifiers from the scientific literature and a classification competition shows that uncertainties can be surprisingly large and limit performance evaluation. In fact, some published classifiers are likely to be misleading. The application of our approach is simple and requires only the confusion matrix. It is agnostic of the underlying classifier. Our method can also be used for the estimation of sample sizes that achieve a desired precision of a performance metric.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Neo: Generalizing Confusion Matrix Visualization to Hierarchical and Multi-Output Labelscited by 17
- 2024Benchmark Data Repositories for Better Benchmarkingcited by 10
- 2025Statistical Uncertainty Quantification for Aggregate Performance Metrics in Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 10
- 2022Never mind the metrics -- what about the uncertainty? Visualising confusion matrix metric distributionscited by 0
- 2025Statistical Uncertainty Quantification for Aggregate Performance Metrics in Machine Learning Benchmarks8 Jan 2025
- 2024Benchmark Data Repositories for Better Benchmarking31 Oct 2024
- 2022Never mind the metrics -- what about the uncertainty? Visualising confusion matrix metric distributions5 Jun 2022
- 2021Neo: Generalizing Confusion Matrix Visualization to Hierarchical and Multi-Output Labels24 Oct 2021