mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Is Network the Bottleneck of Distributed Training?

arXiv 2006.10103 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2020cs.DC cs.LGcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently there has been a surge of research on improving the communication efficiency of distributed training. However, little work has been done to systematically understand whether the network is the bottleneck and to what extent. In this paper, we take a first-principles approach to measure and analyze the network performance of distributed training. As expected, our measurement confirms that communication is the component that blocks distributed training from linear scale-out. However, contrary to the common belief, we find that the network is running at low utilization and that if the network can be fully utilized, distributed training can achieve a scaling factor of close to one. Moreover, while many recent proposals on gradient compression advocate over 100x compression ratio, we show that under full network utilization, there is no need for gradient compression in 100 Gbps network. On the other hand, a lower speed network like 10 Gbps requires only 2x--5x gradients compression ratio to achieve almost linear scale-out. Compared to application-level techniques like gradient compression, network-level optimizations do not require changes to applications and do not hurt the performance of trained models. As such, we advocate that the real challenge of distributed training is for the network community to develop high-performance network transport to fully utilize the network capacity and achieve linear scale-out.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

19 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021TACCL: Guiding Collective Algorithm Synthesis using Communication Sketchescited by 38
  2. 2021On the Utility of Gradient Compression in Distributed Training Systemscited by 26
  3. 2021Time-Correlated Sparsification for Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 25
  4. 2023The Evolution of Distributed Systems for Graph Neural Networks and their Origin in Graph Processing and Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 13
  5. 2023GraVAC: Adaptive Compression for Communication-Efficient Distributed DL Trainingcited by 10
  6. 2023ScaDLES: Scalable Deep Learning over Streaming data at the Edgecited by 8
  7. 2023Evaluation and Optimization of Gradient Compression for Distributed Deep Learningcited by 7
  8. 2025Mycroft: Tracing Dependencies in Collective Communication Towards Reliable LLM Trainingcited by 6
  9. 2022Quant 4.0: Engineering Quantitative Investment with Automated, Explainable and Knowledge-driven Artificial Intelligencecited by 5
  10. 2024From promise to practice: realizing high-performance decentralized trainingcited by 4
  11. 2021Peering Beyond the Gradient Veil with Distributed Auto Differentiationcited by 1
  12. 2021MergeComp: A Compression Scheduler for Scalable Communication-Efficient Distributed Trainingcited by 1
7 more
  1. 2022ByteComp: Revisiting Gradient Compression in Distributed Trainingcited by 1
  2. 2022Communication-efficient distributed eigenspace estimation with arbitrary node failurescited by 1
  3. 2024Federated Learning Nodes Can Reconstruct Peers' Image Datacited by 1
  4. 2024Lion Cub: Minimizing Communication Overhead in Distributed Lioncited by 1
  5. 2025CollaPipe: Adaptive Segment-Optimized Pipeline Parallelism for Collaborative LLM Training in Heterogeneous Edge Networkscited by 1
  6. 2021ECRM: Efficient Fault Tolerance for Recommendation Model Training via Erasure Codingcited by 0
  7. 2026Tula: Optimizing Time, Cost, and Generalization in Distributed Large-Batch Trainingcited by 0