mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

New Interpretations of Normalization Methods in Deep Learning

arXiv 2006.09104 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, a variety of normalization methods have been proposed to help train neural networks, such as batch normalization (BN), layer normalization (LN), weight normalization (WN), group normalization (GN), etc. However, mathematical tools to analyze all these normalization methods are lacking. In this paper, we first propose a lemma to define some necessary tools. Then, we use these tools to make a deep analysis on popular normalization methods and obtain the following conclusions: 1) Most of the normalization methods can be interpreted in a unified framework, namely normalizing pre-activations or weights onto a sphere; 2) Since most of the existing normalization methods are scaling invariant, we can conduct optimization on a sphere with scaling symmetry removed, which can help stabilize the training of network; 3) We prove that training with these normalization methods can make the norm of weights increase, which could cause adversarial vulnerability as it amplifies the attack. Finally, a series of experiments are conducted to verify these claims.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

8 papers.